Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 14 March 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2354 contributions

|

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 November 2025

Martin Whitfield

Let us turn to the designation of a freedom of information officer. There has been a lot of support for that, but there has also been evidence to say that it is unnecessary. One of the challenges appears to be that the designation needs to be of someone who is high enough within an organisation to have an effect, whereas the work of freedom of information is frequently done by staff at a much lower level. How will we get over the challenge of holding a designated official responsible when internal documents will suggest that everything has been designated to a lowly person, things have gone wrong and it is their fault? How do we make sure that the designation works at the level that—I think—you anticipate, so that cultural change can be driven by a senior person without the blame being poured down the ladder to someone else?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 November 2025

Martin Whitfield

So, the purpose behind it is to reflect for freedom of information the success that data protection officers have brought to the system.

As a by-question, we have heard evidence that, if you then include records management, you are bringing together the three areas that are crucial to the issue and probably crucial to the cultural change that you have referred to. Did you consider merging those three roles in the bill?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 November 2025

Martin Whitfield

One thing that we have heard some evidence about is that very small organisations may struggle to provide that different role. However, you are suggesting that that role is complementary to the data protection role, for which there are no exclusions, so someone must be responsible for that. The resource implication is therefore very small for that designation, because it is probably the person who is doing it anyway.

10:00  

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 November 2025

Martin Whitfield

That is very helpful.

I want to talk to the offences that have been suggested and considered. We have heard lots of different evidence about the matter, and you have mentioned that, although you would hope that a lot of those offences would never be used, the aim of the provisions is to change the culture. Do we need to create another offence just to change the culture and the approach to freedom of information?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 November 2025

Martin Whitfield

Are you comfortable with the unusual circumstance that the time for prosecution would run not from the event but from the start of the investigation? In essence, the three years for prosecution would not run from the destruction of documents but from the start of the investigation—unlike many offences, which are occasioned by the actual act. That might be inevitable because of the circumstances of the offence.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 November 2025

Martin Whitfield

Is that not the challenge, though? A reasonable person might think that it runs from the date on which something went into the shredder. However, if the facts did not come out until a few years later, and the time would then run from that investigation, it is my understanding of the—

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 November 2025

Martin Whitfield

Let me ask the question differently, then. Is it the case that there is no intention for a retrospective criminal offence that would cover events that occurred before the commencement of the act, irrespective of the fact that the time for prosecution might run from the point of the start of an investigation?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 November 2025

Martin Whitfield

How long do you think a designation should take? I know that that is a really hard question to answer.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 November 2025

Martin Whitfield

You have specified that it would be an additional mechanism by which designation could happen, but do you also see it as an angel on the shoulder of the Government to ensure that it accelerates its own role in designation?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 November 2025

Martin Whitfield

Thank you, Katy. As the convener, I will grab the opportunity to kick off. You have already discussed the recommendations that came out of session 5, and you have talked about how all those who have held the Information Commissioner role have indicated shortcomings that they have identified. On a personal level, are you a bit disappointed that a member’s bill has been required to deal with the reform?