Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 6 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2076 contributions

|

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 June 2025

Martin Whitfield

That is very helpful. I am grateful, minister. Do other committee members have any questions?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Cross-Party Groups

Meeting date: 26 June 2025

Martin Whitfield

I concur with that. Asking for more information in no way means a predetermined decision that we do not want the change to happen. However, there is a requirement that this committee oversee the purposes of CPGs, which should reflect the work that they do. I am incredibly grateful to the cross-party group on deafness for having come to us in a positive way about the matter. I am merely suggesting an exploration to see whether an element of cross-party work has not been noted. I am sure that that is not the case, but we can seek an explanation of that and then return to the matter. Are we content with that?

Members indicated agreement.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Cross-Party Groups

Meeting date: 26 June 2025

Martin Whitfield

Finally, members might recall that, in January and February, we considered an update in relation to CPGs’ compliance with the rules. We indicated that we intended to withdraw recognition from the CPG on shared parenting on the basis of a failure to comply with the rules on submission of the required documentation. Following discussions with the convener of the group, Fulton MacGregor MSP—I thank Fulton for his engagement on the matter—it was agreed that the CPG could be given an opportunity to catch up with the missing documentation but that it would be for the committee to indicate whether to continue to afford recognition to the group.

The group has now provided all the required documentation, and I thank Fulton MacGregor and those who support him for doing that. I invite the committee to decide whether it is content for the group to continue for the rest of the parliamentary session, because it is in compliance. Are we content with that?

Members indicated agreement.

Meeting closed at 09:24.  

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 June 2025

Martin Whitfield

That is very helpful. Do any of my colleagues have any questions?

As there are no comments, we move to agenda item 4, which is a debate on the motion.

Motion moved,

That the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee recommends that the Scottish Parliament (Constituencies and Regions) Order 2025 [draft] be approved.—[Jamie Hepburn]

Motion agreed to.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Cross-Party Groups

Meeting date: 26 June 2025

Martin Whitfield

The next item is consideration of a request from the cross-party group on deafness to change its purpose. Members will see from the clerk’s note that the convener of the CPG has explained that the group has worked to support people who are deaf and deafblind and that the group now wishes to amend its purpose

“to reflect our work more accurately and respect the preferred language of all our members.”

Do members have any comments or questions on this?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 June 2025

Martin Whitfield

Our next agenda item is the Scottish Parliament (Constituencies and Regions) Order 2025. Minister, would you like to make a short opening statement on the instrument?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 June 2025

Martin Whitfield

Thank you very much. I have a couple of questions and reflections, which you have already hinted at. Our sister committee—the DPLRC—identified some errors in the original draft order. As you said, they affected less than 1 per cent of the list and were rectified.

In your opening statement, you talked about the outreach to ensure that the updated list is as accurate as possible. Could any steps be taken to improve that? It seems to require others to come and feed in to that list, albeit that they are invited to do so. Do you have confidence in the oversight that your part of Government holds with regard to the creation of that list?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 June 2025

Martin Whitfield

The committee will have to report on the outcomes of both of our decisions today in due course. Are members content that we will produce one report on both instruments, and are they content to delegate to me authority to approve the draft report?

Members indicated agreement.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 June 2025

Martin Whitfield

Are you still confident that the specificity in this order is the right approach, rather than the more general one, which potentially leaves it open for an individual to question whether they are covered?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 June 2025

Martin Whitfield

That is fine. I am more than happy that the publication of the order puts those entries sufficiently on the public record—it saves your having to go through the whole list.

I have a final question. What test is applied in relation to why disqualification will take place? You hinted at the matter when you mentioned the new body, in which a position would clearly be seen as a conflict. This is not a test, but can you articulate the test that is applied to decide whether a position should fit into the disqualification order?