The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1487 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Martin Whitfield
Right. Oliver Mundell has a question.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Martin Whitfield
Minister, if you are happy for us to do so, the committee will write to you with a couple of questions about the associated secondary legislation. In the meantime, what is the Government’s position on anonymous voter registration and the extension to domestic abuse protection orders, given the proposed changes in other parts of the country that might affect people there? If someone moved to Scotland, would they be able to apply for anonymous registration because of the physical and/or psychological harm that they are at risk of? I understand that we still need to make changes.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Martin Whitfield
Yes, and I specifically chose the issue of overnight counts because, interestingly, that is the one area on which you pointed out in your correspondence an intention to consult the Scottish Parliament. There is a difference between your open-door policy, which I absolutely endorse and have used on occasions, and a consultation in which members and other consultees are actively approached in order to seek their views. There is a different emphasis there. If you draw a conclusion from that consultation, it is helpful to know how it happened.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Martin Whitfield
As always, Iain Hockenhull anticipates my very final question. Do you have a meeting date for the panel to discuss the matter?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Martin Whitfield
That is helpful. I have no doubt that the committee will also inquire about that, because it is the funding question. Various committees of the Parliament have taken a great interest in the commissioners in Scotland and the cost of those and other entities because, at the end of the day, part of ensuring confidence in the system is knowing that there is adequate funding for something to happen. Discussions about the pilot schemes demonstrate that some of these things are not inexpensive. The financial memorandum rightly highlighted the unknown quantity with regard to the costs of the corporate body that is being proposed, so we might continue to press you for further details.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Martin Whitfield
Those who currently host the voluntary EMB might look differently at a non-voluntary entity.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Martin Whitfield
The challenge of using priority statements has been spoken about, because the EMB must remain at arm’s length from those whose election it is overseeing. I understand the mention of the Scottish Government’s priority statement, but you have indicated that, potentially, the Scottish Parliament—I assume that you mean the Parliament itself rather than the SPCB—could make a priority statement. Will you explain that further?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Martin Whitfield
Absolutely—they are achievable. Again, the devil will always be in the detail. Predominantly, elections are handled very successfully here in Scotland and there is a great deal of confidence in them. One of the assurances that this committee is seeking is that, as the bill becomes a piece of legislation, that vehicle of trust and security can move forward, and it is one of our roles to ensure that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Martin Whitfield
An issue that could arise with an automatic registration pilot is that—I say this ever so slightly flippantly—there might be a postcode lottery when it comes down to those who might be part of it. When you look at the figures for the number of people who are not on the electoral register, you can see that a pilot could make a very significant difference to the electoral pool in an area, be it for a council election or, indeed, a Scottish Parliament election. If we agree in principle that there should be automatic registration, it should happen universally to ensure that no individual voter is excluded. The flipside, then, is that it will ensure a playing field across the whole of Scotland.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Martin Whitfield
We have a couple of questions about other bits of secondary legislation, but if you do not mind, minister, it might be easier for the committee to write to you for an update on each of the areas that you have highlighted, plus others, particularly for the benefit of members who are not on this committee. For example, a number of members are rightly concerned about and seek reassurance on the issue of tactile devices.