The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2354 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Martin Whitfield
As no other member has indicated a desire to speak, I call the minister.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Martin Whitfield
The result of the division is: For 3, Against 2, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 90 agreed to.
Long Title agreed to.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Martin Whitfield
Will the member explain why the amendments that he proposes, which would mean substantial changes to the bill as introduced, still effectively retain those two steps of the initial petition and then the poll on whether the MSP should stay or go, rather than moving to a single decision in relation to a member being recalled and ceasing to be an MSP and then moving straight to taking the next person on the list? Can you explain why you want that second step?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Martin Whitfield
Do you want to explain, Mr Simpson?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Martin Whitfield
The regional recall poll will have—
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Martin Whitfield
That is all right. Mr Simpson, are you happy to take a subsequent intervention from Sue Webber?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Martin Whitfield
Group 2 is on the criminal offence ground for recall. Amendment 110, in the name of Sue Webber, is grouped with amendments 111, 93 to 96, and 112 to 123. If amendment 117 is agreed to, I cannot call amendment 33, which has already been debated in the group on recall process for regional members.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Martin Whitfield
It is up to members whether to take an intervention, but I am grateful to you for doing so. Are you not concerned that, if your amendments are passed, it would open the bill to a human rights claim, whereby natural justice would patently not be followed?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Martin Whitfield
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 3, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 110 disagreed to.
Amendment 111 moved—[Sue Webber].
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Martin Whitfield
The question is, that amendment 111 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.