The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2076 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
So, the Scottish Government is confident that the authority to make provision for payments will prevent an accusation against the corporate body that it is failing to meet the 1998 act because it is not making such provision.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
Did you consider the challenge that, although ennoblement occurs when it occurs in the House of Lords, the individual will be aware that ennoblement is coming, and, funnily enough, they actually have a huge amount of control over when it happens? Did that form any part of your concerns or, to go back to the policy behind the measure, are you satisfied that it is existing members of the House of Lords that you are talking about when it comes to dual mandates, rather than someone who is anticipating becoming a member?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is very helpful. It goes back to the policy decision that being an MSP is a full-time job and the public expectation is that the member has a full-time commitment to it and nothing else to detract from it. That underlies the practical decisions that are having to be taken in the SSIs.
Thank you for your patience, Graham.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
Excellent. Thank you.
Our next agenda items are the debates on the three pieces of subordinate legislation that are before us. The first is on motion S6M-18743.
As members will be aware, only the minister and members can speak during any debate on the motion. I invite the minister to move the motion.
Motion moved,
That the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee recommends that the Scottish Parliament (Disqualification of Members of the House of Commons) Regulations 2025 be approved.—[Graeme Dey]
Motion agreed to.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
The next item is a discussion of motion S6M-18744. I invite the minister to move the motion.
Motion moved,
That the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee recommends that the Scottish Parliament (Disqualification of Members of the House of Lords) Regulations 2025 be approved.—[Graeme Dey]
Motion agreed to.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
The next item is a debate on motion S6M-18745. I invite the minister to move the motion.
Motion moved,
That the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee recommends that the Scottish Parliament (Disqualification of Councillors) Regulations 2025 be approved.—[Graeme Dey]
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
Martin Whitfield
There is a point on which I seek clarification. There seems to be a tension between new rule 38(4A) of the Scottish Parliament election rules and the previous rule—rule 46—with regard to assistance. I understand that, historically, the rule was designed for when the candidate actually casts their vote, rather than their journey to the polling station and the process throughout. Our fellow committee raised concerns about that in correspondence with the minister.
As a representative of the Scottish Government, are you able to state, for the record, whether you are content with the manner in which it has been directed that rule 46 will work in practice, given that part of the policy intention is to allow for innovation with regard to devices and the support that can be offered in future? You have hinted that you are content with that. Is that fair?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
Martin Whitfield
For the purposes of the election in May next year, is the Scottish Government content that the interpretation is in the right place to allow support to be offered?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
Martin Whitfield
I think that the challenge and danger lies with the problem that is being encountered. If we are talking about an individual being unable to vote, the fact is that that problem will not be raised by those who provide feedback. It simply will not have happened to them. As we heard when we took evidence on the 2025 act—I should say that this is not a criticism—you use those in the electoral field, in the widest sense, to do the outreach to all of these groups; indeed, we heard on a number of occasions about that challenge, which relates not only to resources but to the practical aspects of how we speak to groups that are among our most marginalised from a democratic point of view. I take it that that is something that you will continue to consider.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
Martin Whitfield
My last question is in relation to the six-month period. Other than the regulations that will be laid on Monday, which relate to people who have already registered for a postal vote having that period extended so that there is no perceived risk of losing their vote, is any other further secondary legislation envisaged?
A number of matters that we have consulted on have not appeared in the instrument. We are getting close to the six-month period. Is there any intention of introducing any further legislation, other than what you have indicated to us, that you are aware of?