The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2076 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
Who will take responsibility for the monitoring?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
Do you have a precedent for that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
Okay—I am grateful for that. Are you content, minister, with those answers on behalf of the Scottish Government?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
I apologise to Graham Simpson, but I have a final question before I come to him.
At present, according to my understanding, lords essentially suspend their membership of the House of Lords for the period, and that cannot be reinstated without it being a matter of public notice. What was the policy reason for not being satisfied with that, but requiring entire termination from the House of Lords?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
Before you continue, Graham, Ruth Maguire has a supplementary question on that point.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
Thank you. Graham?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
By way of clarification, the purpose of the statutory instruments is not to remove someone from being a councillor or an MP or being in the House of Lords; it would prevent an individual sitting as an MSP if those other consequences existed outside of those periods. It is not about this place ordering someone to step down as a councillor and saying, “Should you choose not to, the consequence will be that you cannot be an MSP.” Is that correct?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
The committee will report on the outcome of the decisions on the SSIs in due course. Are members content to delegate the authority to approve the draft report to the convener?
Members indicated agreement.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is excellent. Thank you. Sue Webber, would you like to start the questions?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
For clarification, minister, with regard to the proposals before the committee in these three SSIs, two have a remuneration deduction that relates to the MSP salary. Can you confirm that discussions have taken place with the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body about the consequences of the SSIs? Ailsa McKeever, I think that you suggested that that is the case, but I would like it on the record, because if we have an unresolved problem in one area that you are asking others to act on, that might raise a concern about the SSIs that are being presented to the committee as a formula for arriving at what was carried through unanimously in the legislation. Therefore, is it the case that there have been discussions with the SPCB and that the practical provisions in relation to how any deductions take place would fall to it?