The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2050 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
No problem—that is excellent. I call Rona Mackay.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Yes.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
So, it is not a cultural stance that proactive publication is wrong, and the reality of understanding what is—and possibly more important, what is not—covered by the term may move the Government’s stance.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Can I clarify that? It is not the only protection that would prevent disclosure of information. In effect, the First Minister’s veto is the last of a number of walls that have to be gone through or over—however we want to describe it. It is the last step of the Scottish Government, which is represented, along with the law officers, by the First Minister taking the decision, and my understanding is that reference then needs to be made to previous barriers that could have prevented the publication. The power has never been used, and it is an outlier on the international stage.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
You are confident that the definition of freedom of information that we have had over the past 20 years is sufficiently robust and is at such a level that we can still rely on our top-level understanding of what we mean by it. What will change is the technology that gives access to it. Would it be fair to say that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Interestingly, the Government’s proposal was to make such lobbying of parliamentary interest under the 2016 act.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
If we compare the bill to the Lobbying (Scotland) Act 2016, we see that the reality is that it is not the Parliament that carries out the designation of the new entities that are deemed to be lobbying. That is done by another body.
What we are talking about is the decision point. As Ross Grimley has rightly said, rather than designate bodies through secondary legislation, it is effectively done by way of motion.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is helpful.
You have picked up on the fact that the delivery of services as well as the technology have changed over the past 20 years. Interestingly, the bill itself does not extend the scope of the legislation. Is that a shortfall in the bill? Is the bill missing items that you would have liked to see in relation to extending how freedom of information would apply, and to whom?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
In your proposed process, the clarification would effectively happen at the start, before there was any breakdown in relations or the organisation was set upon, which would mean that a conversation would happen and what the individual making the freedom of information request needed would actually be understood.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
So, there is no review of schedule 1 going on at the moment.