The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2076 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
What are the current challenges and barriers to freedom of information for those who are trying to use it?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
The information officer is one of the new figures introduced by the bill, and a lot of evidence in that respect has been drawn from the experience of general data protection regulation and the role of records management officers. Is that a fair comparison, or should we be looking for something else from the role of information officer with regard to obligations and expectations? What should we understand by the role? After all, it will be important to clarify that as we progress with the bill.
Ben, I will come to you first again, as you are online.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Do you want to direct that to Ben Worthy first?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Juliet and Alex, thank you for your evidence today. If there is anything that comes to mind afterwards, you know how to get in touch with us. As always, we know how to get in touch with you if we have further questions.
11:15 Meeting continued in private until 11:16.Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
That was very helpful. Thank you for those introductory remarks.
Picking up on what you have just said, Professor Dunion, I point out that a substantial number of the consultation responses criticise the length of time that it has taken to review the FOI landscape. Obviously, that is one of the bill’s fundamental intentions.
In the previous session, committees of the Parliament conducted post-legislative scrutiny of the freedom of information legislation and had subsequent consultations. From your point of view—I will come to you first, Kevin, as this is really a follow-up to your previous answer—does the bill encompass all the suggestions that were made at the time?
09:15Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
The solution is, in essence, going to involve a positive outreach, if that is appropriate, to very specific individuals, presumably driven by their age—or their place in the demographics; let me put it that way—to tell them that there might have been substantial change. Are you confident that that will be facilitated in the period of time that we have?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Our next item is consideration of draft statutory guidance, which is subject to the negative procedure and has been referred to the committee for scrutiny on policy grounds. We considered this document at our last meeting, when Emma Roddick indicated that she intended to lodge a motion that the document not be approved. Before we move to the formal consideration of the motion, this agenda item provides the opportunity for members to make further comments before we move to the formal proceedings.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
I am grateful for that contribution. The minister is not giving evidence on the guidance, but, if he wishes to comment on it, I am content for him to do so. However, first, Emma, you eloquently put on the record the challenges with the guidance, and I wonder whether, irrespective of the outcome in relation to the formal procedure, the committee would be content to write to the Government and the minister to express our concerns and to seek an opportunity to ensure that this does not occur again. Is the committee content to do that?
Members indicated agreement.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
That go-live date is doing a lot of lifting. I would in no way wish this to happen, but if challenges emerge, it seems that, given that you are looking at June, there will still be a period of time in which steps can be taken to obviate any problems.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
I am grateful for that. I now suspend the meeting to allow a changeover of witnesses.
09:06 Meeting suspended.