The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1824 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Martin Whitfield
We are living in a period following an absolute tragedy, and the security of individual elected members, and of the venues where they gather, is paramount. The SSI and that discussion about security predate recent events. It is my understanding that additional security is now needed because of that event. There is advice from Police Scotland and other bodies about that.
What was being considered at the time, given that the responsibility for funding security will rest with the individual and their political party and that the purpose of the SSI is merely that the cost will appear in the return but not be set against the totals that need to be expended? Was anything more specific being considered?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Martin Whitfield
We will now consider the proposed CPG on long Covid. I welcome to the meeting Jackie Baillie, who is a co-convener of the proposed group. Again, we will make a decision on the proposed CPG under the next agenda item, and the clerks will notify you of the decision in due course. I invite you to make an opening statement on your proposed CPG.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Martin Whitfield
You are a co-convener, so it is right to note that Alex Cole-Hamilton MSP and Sandesh Gulhane MSP are the other co-conveners—is that correct?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Martin Whitfield
We will now have a short suspension.
10:33 Meeting suspended.Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Martin Whitfield
The final group that we will consider today is a proposed CPG on culture and communities. I welcome Sarah Boyack MSP, who joins us as the convener of the proposed group. I invite Sarah to make some opening comments.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Martin Whitfield
That is helpful.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Martin Whitfield
That is kind. Thank you very much indeed, Sarah.
Agenda item 8 is on the approval of cross-party groups. It is for the committee to consider whether to accord recognition to the proposed cross-party groups that we have heard from today—that is, the proposed cross-party group on Ireland, the proposed cross-party group on long Covid, the proposed cross-party group on outdoor education, the proposed cross-party group on women, families and justice, and the proposed cross-party group on culture and communities.
Do members have any comments to make before I formally ask the committee whether to accord recognition to the proposed cross-party groups?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Martin Whitfield
Those who drafted the equality impact assessment certainly seemed to face a challenge in saying what the impact would be, given the lack of data. I think that there is agreement on that. I will push further: will the follow-up take place on the basis of the expenditure returns that come after the council elections in May next year?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Martin Whitfield
I am sorry, but I am talking about the impact of the policy on the excluded expenditure returns, because that falls under the Government’s responsibility.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Martin Whitfield
The wording in the SSI is broad. It talks about the additional costs that any disabled person would face. It is only when we look at the policy note that we see that there appear to be emphases and restrictions. I absolutely accept and whole-heartedly agree that this should be about removing the additional expenses that some individuals face in running for election, as compared with others.
The certainty of that answer brings me to my last question on this SSI, which is about the bodies that were consulted. I found the bodies that were reached out to a little limited—let me put it that way—given that various bodies in Scotland have substantial evidential experience that could have been contributed. I hear what you say about the responses that you received, but were positive steps taken to reach out and ask disability organisations and disabled elected representatives to feed into this?