The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2076 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Please do.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Before I bring in Katy Clark, I want to ask about the proposal to extend the offence of altering or destroying records. Such things frequently come to light because someone has made a freedom of information request. Do you see any challenges there? Do you see value in extending that in cases where no freedom of information request has been made and the destruction of the records has come into public knowledge in a completely different way? Is there anything that we need to be cautious about in introducing a blanket extension of the provisions?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Therefore, what is required is the next supportive step to move from compliance—“I will comply because I have to, and I will comply absolutely”—towards an environment in which people better understand both the importance and, in a sense, the ownership of the information.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Oh, I am sorry.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
I see that there are no other questions from members, but I would like to pick up on your previous point, minister. The situation is that, in effect, the archive of signatures is potentially five years old; you have identified the two demographic groups where there is most likely to be a change; and you have said that a risk has been identified in that respect.
I have two questions. First, can you illuminate us further on any discussions that you have had about how that risk will be reduced, particularly with regard to younger people? As you have said, we will be talking about a small group of voters, but they might be as old as 21 now, if they applied when they were 16. I note that the Government has issued the normal United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child compatibility statement, but what is your confidence that that statement is correct, given the risk that you have already expressed?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Are you confident that, even if it does not quite cover all the previous recommendations, the bill will move us substantially forward? Will it allow us to catch up, if not catch up completely?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Does any member wish to contribute to the debate?
Minister, do you wish to add anything?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
As no one wishes to add anything, the question is, that motion S6M-19488 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
We return with our second panel of witnesses. I welcome Alex Parsons, who is joining us online. He is a senior researcher at mySociety and WhatDoTheyKnow. We are joined in the room by Juliet Swann, who is the nations and regions programme manager for Transparency International UK.
We will move straight to questions if that is all right. Using the privilege of being convener, I will kick off with a question that I started with during the first panel. We consider the freedom of information provisions in Scotland to be well used and well regarded, but is that correct? Are we as good as we think we are?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
A lot of the evidence refers to the need for adequate information management systems, so might there be a benefit in the same person dealing with both aspects, even though the roles are slightly separate and distinct from each other? Do you see that as a way of making the cultural shift that is needed?