The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2357 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
That is fine. I am interested in it from the administrative point of view, so that we could have that on the record.
My other question is on an aspect that seems to be omitted from the bill, which is the emergency proxy vote, particularly for carers. I will come to you first, Andy Hunter, on the practical matters, and then to you, Malcolm Burr. What are your views on that situation? From my experience of running around on election day, that is the one question that keeps coming up, but no one seems to know the answer to it.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
From an administrative point of view, is the existing system fine? Could it take other applicants’ names being added to it without too much challenge?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
No—not unless you have anything that follows from that answer.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
I want to move on to another provision that the bill proposes, which is in relation to the postponement of elections. All three organisations that are represented today have made submissions on that. Andy Hunter, I will come to you first, because I was interested in the point in your submission that, in essence, elections could be postponed by up to 16 weeks. I do not expect you to comment on the policy decision in that regard but, with regard to the practicalities of a single or double suspension, what is the effect at the chalkface, to use an old teaching phrase, when the phone rings and you are told that an election has been postponed?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
If we put aside the cause of the postponement, would a fixed, albeit longer, period rather than two shorter periods be helpful? Would it be helpful to know even before a postponement happens that it would be for a set period? Would that make the administration easier?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
Things would reset anyway.
Before I open up the topic to other witnesses, I want to ask about the recruitment of staff, which you highlighted as being one of the challenges. Do you want to explain why that is a challenge, given that there is not a significant number of people who only ever do election work and sit around in their holiday homes for the bits in between?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
Do you have a short question, Stephen, or has it been answered?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
That is very helpful.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
Robert Nicol and Andy Hunter, do you want to add anything on that just now?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
Our second agenda item is evidence on the Scottish Elections (Representation and Reform) Bill. We are joined by Malcolm Burr, convener of the Electoral Management Board for Scotland; Andy Hunter, chair of the Scotland and Northern Ireland branch of the Association of Electoral Administrators; and Robert Nicol, vice-chair of the Scottish Assessors Association’s electoral registration committee and electoral registration officer for East Renfrewshire, Inverclyde and Renfrewshire.
Those are very long titles, but you are all very welcome at committee to give your contributions on the bill. If you are content, I will push off with questions, with the usual convener’s proviso that not everybody has to answer all the questions, but you should feel free to do so if you want to contribute something.
I kick off with the proposal in the bill to extend candidacy rights, particularly to those with limited leave to remain. I ask Malcolm Burr to answer first. What are your thoughts on the advantages and disadvantages of that proposal, and do you have any concerns about it?