The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1475 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Martin Whitfield
Is it correct that the increase in the spending limits in this instrument takes no account of any additional expenditure on Covid measures and that it has been calculated just as an uplift? I ask merely for the record.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Martin Whitfield
But only until 5 pm.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Martin Whitfield
Thank you for that, minister. My intention is to work through each of the four SSIs in order. That will make the next agenda item more straightforward.
The first SSI is the Representation of the People (Postal Voting for Local Government Elections) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2021.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Martin Whitfield
Item 2 is subordinate legislation. We will take evidence on two affirmative and two negative Scottish statutory instruments. I welcome George Adam, the Minister for Parliamentary Business, and his officials Iain Hockenhull and Craig McGuffie. I invite the minister to make a short opening statement, after which the committee will ask questions.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Martin Whitfield
That is excellent. Thank you. It is wonderful to see in your application so many organisations supporting the group. I also put on record how positive it is to see two CPGs with so much of an overlap coming together. I hope that they will provide a stronger voice as they move forward.
Thank you for attending this morning’s meeting. We will make our decision under the next agenda item, and the clerks will let you know the outcome.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Martin Whitfield
Those who drafted the equality impact assessment certainly seemed to face a challenge in saying what the impact would be, given the lack of data. I think that there is agreement on that. I will push further: will the follow-up take place on the basis of the expenditure returns that come after the council elections in May next year?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Martin Whitfield
I am sorry, but I am talking about the impact of the policy on the excluded expenditure returns, because that falls under the Government’s responsibility.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Martin Whitfield
The wording in the SSI is broad. It talks about the additional costs that any disabled person would face. It is only when we look at the policy note that we see that there appear to be emphases and restrictions. I absolutely accept and whole-heartedly agree that this should be about removing the additional expenses that some individuals face in running for election, as compared with others.
The certainty of that answer brings me to my last question on this SSI, which is about the bodies that were consulted. I found the bodies that were reached out to a little limited—let me put it that way—given that various bodies in Scotland have substantial evidential experience that could have been contributed. I hear what you say about the responses that you received, but were positive steps taken to reach out and ask disability organisations and disabled elected representatives to feed into this?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Martin Whitfield
It is fair to say that, in the previous election, events in East Lothian led to an emergency proxy being issued at about 9 o’clock, and I can see similar events occurring in council elections.
As no other committee members have any questions on the Representation of the People (Postal Voting for Local Government Elections) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2021, we will move to the Scottish Local Government Elections Amendment Order 2021.
I will use the convener’s privilege and start the questioning, because a couple of matters concern me, the first of which is the equality impact assessment. I note from the information that was provided that there was an assurance that the assessment would be published before the instrument was laid before the chamber. It has, indeed, been published alongside the instrument. I do not know whether the minister has had sight of the equality impact assessment, but some questions were raised when it was being compiled. The assessment says:
“Follow-up after the elections on how this expenditure exclusion is used may be helpful in understanding the impact of the policy.”
In addition, it refers to a lack of data to feed into decision making.
First, will the minister give an assurance that there will be a follow-up? Secondly, on a slightly higher level, do you have any concerns about the equality impact assessment, given the lack of data about the people to whom it applies?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Martin Whitfield
In relation to excluding certain items from the expenditure, the equality impact assessment specifically says:
“Follow-up after the elections on how this expenditure exclusion is used may be helpful in understanding the impact of the policy.”
I understand that the changes will obviously apply to future elections, because you do not have the data on this one. There has been a very strong request, and it seems to me that, unless there is confirmation that there will be that follow-up, the impact of the policy will be unknown.