Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 2 May 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1475 contributions

|

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 October 2021

Martin Whitfield

Is it correct that the increase in the spending limits in this instrument takes no account of any additional expenditure on Covid measures and that it has been calculated just as an uplift? I ask merely for the record.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 October 2021

Martin Whitfield

But only until 5 pm.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 October 2021

Martin Whitfield

Thank you for that, minister. My intention is to work through each of the four SSIs in order. That will make the next agenda item more straightforward.

The first SSI is the Representation of the People (Postal Voting for Local Government Elections) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2021.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 October 2021

Martin Whitfield

Item 2 is subordinate legislation. We will take evidence on two affirmative and two negative Scottish statutory instruments. I welcome George Adam, the Minister for Parliamentary Business, and his officials Iain Hockenhull and Craig McGuffie. I invite the minister to make a short opening statement, after which the committee will ask questions.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Cross-Party Groups

Meeting date: 28 October 2021

Martin Whitfield

That is excellent. Thank you. It is wonderful to see in your application so many organisations supporting the group. I also put on record how positive it is to see two CPGs with so much of an overlap coming together. I hope that they will provide a stronger voice as they move forward.

Thank you for attending this morning’s meeting. We will make our decision under the next agenda item, and the clerks will let you know the outcome.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 October 2021

Martin Whitfield

Those who drafted the equality impact assessment certainly seemed to face a challenge in saying what the impact would be, given the lack of data. I think that there is agreement on that. I will push further: will the follow-up take place on the basis of the expenditure returns that come after the council elections in May next year?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 October 2021

Martin Whitfield

I am sorry, but I am talking about the impact of the policy on the excluded expenditure returns, because that falls under the Government’s responsibility.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 October 2021

Martin Whitfield

The wording in the SSI is broad. It talks about the additional costs that any disabled person would face. It is only when we look at the policy note that we see that there appear to be emphases and restrictions. I absolutely accept and whole-heartedly agree that this should be about removing the additional expenses that some individuals face in running for election, as compared with others.

The certainty of that answer brings me to my last question on this SSI, which is about the bodies that were consulted. I found the bodies that were reached out to a little limited—let me put it that way—given that various bodies in Scotland have substantial evidential experience that could have been contributed. I hear what you say about the responses that you received, but were positive steps taken to reach out and ask disability organisations and disabled elected representatives to feed into this?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 October 2021

Martin Whitfield

It is fair to say that, in the previous election, events in East Lothian led to an emergency proxy being issued at about 9 o’clock, and I can see similar events occurring in council elections.

As no other committee members have any questions on the Representation of the People (Postal Voting for Local Government Elections) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2021, we will move to the Scottish Local Government Elections Amendment Order 2021.

I will use the convener’s privilege and start the questioning, because a couple of matters concern me, the first of which is the equality impact assessment. I note from the information that was provided that there was an assurance that the assessment would be published before the instrument was laid before the chamber. It has, indeed, been published alongside the instrument. I do not know whether the minister has had sight of the equality impact assessment, but some questions were raised when it was being compiled. The assessment says:

“Follow-up after the elections on how this expenditure exclusion is used may be helpful in understanding the impact of the policy.”

In addition, it refers to a lack of data to feed into decision making.

First, will the minister give an assurance that there will be a follow-up? Secondly, on a slightly higher level, do you have any concerns about the equality impact assessment, given the lack of data about the people to whom it applies?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 October 2021

Martin Whitfield

In relation to excluding certain items from the expenditure, the equality impact assessment specifically says:

“Follow-up after the elections on how this expenditure exclusion is used may be helpful in understanding the impact of the policy.”

I understand that the changes will obviously apply to future elections, because you do not have the data on this one. There has been a very strong request, and it seems to me that, unless there is confirmation that there will be that follow-up, the impact of the policy will be unknown.