Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 11 February 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2231 contributions

|

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Information Commissioner

Meeting date: 22 February 2024

Martin Whitfield

Yes—the question is whether there should or should not be such a post.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Decision on Taking Business in Private

Meeting date: 8 February 2024

Martin Whitfield

Good morning, and welcome to the third meeting in 2024 of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee. I have received no apologies.

Under agenda item 1, do members agree to take in private item 4, which is on-going consideration of the committee’s work programme?

Members indicated agreement.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Cross-Party Groups (Annual Monitoring Report)

Meeting date: 8 February 2024

Martin Whitfield

I chose the route of explanation to be as empathetic as possible for CPGs. If a CPG has failed to comply and if, having been given an option and depending on the facts, the committee’s view was that the CPG could not maintain or return to its existence, the recognition would be removed. That would not stop the same MSPs or others coming back to the committee to say that they felt that there should be a CPG for whatever the area was. We have dealt with a significant number of recognitions of CPGs.

There is no automatic process whereby something happens without the committee’s involvement, and there are not specific things that automatically trigger a reference to the committee, which speaks to Stephen Kerr’s comments about the individual reasons why some groups might be struggling and some are not. The process allows a reality to get behind the situation that the public can see from the document, which is in the public record, as all the minutes and other items are.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Cross-Party Groups (Annual Monitoring Report)

Meeting date: 8 February 2024

Martin Whitfield

That is sensible. Subject to the committee’s agreement, we could return to this report in three months to see what has changed or improved, notwithstanding the other work that the committee will look at with regard to CPGs.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Cross-Party Groups (Annual Monitoring Report)

Meeting date: 8 February 2024

Martin Whitfield

Yes. For their own compliance, they ceased to be—

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Cross-Party Groups (Annual Monitoring Report)

Meeting date: 8 February 2024

Martin Whitfield

Well, because everything had been successfully achieved, they decided—

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Cross-Party Groups (Annual Monitoring Report)

Meeting date: 8 February 2024

Martin Whitfield

That is excellent.

09:44 Meeting continued in private until 11:15.  

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Cross-Party Groups (Annual Monitoring Report)

Meeting date: 8 February 2024

Martin Whitfield

The committee has been provided with the annual update on cross-party groups’ compliance with the code of conduct. Members have received the papers and I thank the clerks for the extensive work that goes into not only the annual report but the maintenance of the records on cross-party groups.

Cross-party groups are an essential part of the Parliament, in the sense that they allow people from outside this place to have contact with their MSPs and to bring to bear their experience, lived experience and information. CPGs form an important part of MSPs’ work.

It is worth remembering that, at the moment, CPGs are not part of parliamentary procedure here at Holyrood. However, the committee is responsible for monitoring the keeping of the code of conduct as it relates to CPGs.

I invite comments from members before we make decisions. If members are happy, I will start with Stephen Kerr and work my way up the table.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Cross-Party Groups (Annual Monitoring Report)

Meeting date: 8 February 2024

Martin Whitfield

I am not sure whether “lenient” is a word that I would use—

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Cross-Party Groups (Annual Monitoring Report)

Meeting date: 8 February 2024

Martin Whitfield

I would certainly take an individual approach to the reasons for specific CPGs not having complied.

A significant number of CPGs have complied with all the requirements that are imposed on them. However, there are individual circumstances, and you have mentioned the most common, which is that, having been elevated to a ministerial post, a member runs around to find colleagues to take over the responsibilities that they had. I am sure that the committee will be more than happy to reflect on the individual causes of problems. Such groups will not automatically have their recognition removed; the matter is considered case by case. Whatever we do needs to reflect that.