The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2357 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Martin Whitfield
Thank you. Alice, did you want to come in on notional spend?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Martin Whitfield
We resume our evidence taking on the Scottish Elections (Representation and Reform) Bill at stage 1 with our second panel of witnesses. Professor Alistair Clark is from Newcastle University, and Professor Toby James is from the University of East Anglia. I welcome you both to this evidence session.
Rather than look at specific provisions in the bill, I will kick off by asking for your thoughts on the integrity of Scotland’s devolved elections, which the bill obviously relates to. Is Scotland a good example around the world? Alistair Clark, do you want to kick off on that?
10:15Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Martin Whitfield
Thank you for that, Kay. Hannah, what would you like to see as the priorities?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Martin Whitfield
Thank you, Hannah. This is almost becoming a shopping list. Ahlam, what do you think the priorities should be for funding to increase democratic access?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Martin Whitfield
Just before Jackie moves on to her next question, I want to ask Hannah what she would like to be in the bill. You referred to the Jo Cox Foundation’s recommendations, which the committee is aware of, and you highlighted the one on guidance, which could be progressed without the bill. Are you looking for anything specifically in the bill, or would you like—I will use a phrase that will come back to haunt me—a declaration in the bill of an intention to introduce other legislation, such as statutory instruments, to bring in the guidance? Would that go some way to reassuring you that the intention to have the environment that I think we all want can be achieved without specific calls for that in the primary legislation?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Martin Whitfield
I am certainly content that you fulfilled your responsibility, Jackie. I return to you, Edward.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Martin Whitfield
James Adams, on a slightly different point in the evidence, my understanding is that you would like to ensure that electronic polling cards could be brought in in the future. Is there a reason why we should not bring in electronic polling cards, along with physical polling cards, at the moment? What would be the advantages of electronic polling cards?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Martin Whitfield
Therefore, at the very least, it is a good proposal for a pilot.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Martin Whitfield
I apologise, but I just want to come in on the previous point. You say that there is not much research on digital imprints, but in other democracies—I am thinking of the US—the requirement for a candidate to affirm a message that is put out to the public has existed for a lot longer. Is there research in the US on the effect of that endorsement? Are you aware of any effect? If so, is it good or bad?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Martin Whitfield
Thank you. I am sorry, Ivan.