The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2076 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
I thank Gordon Martin and Kenneth Meechan for their evidence. If something comes to mind subsequently, please feel free to get in touch with the committee. I hope that you do not mind that, if we have additional questions, we will contact you.
I suspend the meeting while we change witnesses.
09:55 Meeting suspended.Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
That brings me to my final question. How workable is the proposal to extend the offence of altering or destroying records to situations where no information request has yet been made? Say that no FOI request has come in, but there is evidence that information has been put beyond reach or destroyed. How workable would it be to make that action an offence? My question is not so much about whether such an action would come about or be discovered but about how workable creating an offence would be.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Reliance on the existing interpretation, which is well understood, is more beneficial than risking long grass and, perhaps, misinterpretation going forward.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is excellent. Thank you.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Thank you. Kenneth Meechan, do you have any comments about the urgency of change or the timeliness of the bill?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
So you have confidence that the system that we have, which the bill seeks to enhance, is working fine and that, although some small changes might be needed, no fundamental change is needed.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Sue Webber has a follow-up question.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
I think that Emma Roddick’s question was more about the delivery of services and how it is changing.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
That model effectively followed public expenditure: wherever the money is spent, FOI should apply to that journey.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
I am grateful for that, minister, and for your offer to act as a conduit.
We now move to the formal procedure, which is a debate on motion S6M-19488. As members will be aware, only the minister and members can speak during the debate. I invite Emma Roddick to move the motion.
Motion moved,
That the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee recommends that the Draft statutory guidance on imprints for non-party campaigners at Scottish Parliamentary elections and council elections in Scotland (SG/2025/215) should not be approved.—[Emma Roddick]