Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 5 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2076 contributions

|

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 November 2025

Martin Whitfield

I thank Gordon Martin and Kenneth Meechan for their evidence. If something comes to mind subsequently, please feel free to get in touch with the committee. I hope that you do not mind that, if we have additional questions, we will contact you.

I suspend the meeting while we change witnesses.

09:55 Meeting suspended.  

09:58 On resuming—  

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 November 2025

Martin Whitfield

That brings me to my final question. How workable is the proposal to extend the offence of altering or destroying records to situations where no information request has yet been made? Say that no FOI request has come in, but there is evidence that information has been put beyond reach or destroyed. How workable would it be to make that action an offence? My question is not so much about whether such an action would come about or be discovered but about how workable creating an offence would be.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 November 2025

Martin Whitfield

Reliance on the existing interpretation, which is well understood, is more beneficial than risking long grass and, perhaps, misinterpretation going forward.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 November 2025

Martin Whitfield

That is excellent. Thank you.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 November 2025

Martin Whitfield

Thank you. Kenneth Meechan, do you have any comments about the urgency of change or the timeliness of the bill?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 November 2025

Martin Whitfield

So you have confidence that the system that we have, which the bill seeks to enhance, is working fine and that, although some small changes might be needed, no fundamental change is needed.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 November 2025

Martin Whitfield

Sue Webber has a follow-up question.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 November 2025

Martin Whitfield

I think that Emma Roddick’s question was more about the delivery of services and how it is changing.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 November 2025

Martin Whitfield

That model effectively followed public expenditure: wherever the money is spent, FOI should apply to that journey.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Document subject to Parliamentary Control

Meeting date: 6 November 2025

Martin Whitfield

I am grateful for that, minister, and for your offer to act as a conduit.

We now move to the formal procedure, which is a debate on motion S6M-19488. As members will be aware, only the minister and members can speak during the debate. I invite Emma Roddick to move the motion.

Motion moved,

That the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee recommends that the Draft statutory guidance on imprints for non-party campaigners at Scottish Parliamentary elections and council elections in Scotland (SG/2025/215) should not be approved.—[Emma Roddick]