The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1487 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Martin Whitfield
Minister, the committee understands the attitudinal difference in the way that the UK Government has presented that legislation to you, but it is the role of the committee to scrutinise the legislation, notwithstanding the attitudinal approach that has been taken.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Martin Whitfield
I was going to ask about that, minister. As I have said, and as you have made plain in your evidence today, the bottom line is that there have been very serious communication difficulties. That said, one of the things that I am picking up is that, notwithstanding that substantial problem and challenge with regard to communications and engagement, there are still fundamental elements of the bill on which there would be disagreement on other grounds, which have been articulated in written evidence and in your evidence this morning.
Homing in on one such area—digital imprints—I note that such a regime applies in Scotland only at election time. On my reading of the bill, it seems that the substantial change to that regime relates to an ability to do something that is, by common agreement, reserved, but it is also proposed that the regime be extended to be applied at all times. Subject to consultation, does the Scottish Government see any value in broadening the digital imprint requirement in that way?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Martin Whitfield
To be fair, I think that Edward Mountain’s question was about whether voter ID would be consulted on. I gather from your evidence that it will not form part of the consultation. Is that right?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Martin Whitfield
We heard evidence from others that personation—in other words, someone pretending to be somebody else—is one of reasons why voter ID is helpful. Does the Scottish Government have any evidence on the extent of personation in Scotland?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Martin Whitfield
We have discussed that aspect in the committee in relation to elections that are much closer to hand than other anticipated ones.
I am in no way questioning your experience, but some of the results of the tests that have taken place seem to show that those who felt most challenged and least supported in casting their vote made the greatest errors with the current equipment. The committee has heard of groups out there with the expertise and experience to be part of the consultation, and I think that it is very important that you go out and ensure that they are included.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Martin Whitfield
Yes. I will politely put it this way: perhaps choose a more helpful tone.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Martin Whitfield
I am grateful for that response. We will move on to questions from Paul McLennan.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Martin Whitfield
Good morning, and welcome to the ninth meeting in 2021 of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee. I remind members who are joining us on BlueJeans to put an R in the chat function if they want to speak.
Agenda item 1 is a decision on taking business in private. Does the committee agree to take in private item 4, which is consideration of its approach to standing orders rule changes, and item 5, which is consideration of the committee’s work programme?
Members indicated agreement.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Martin Whitfield
Agenda item 3 is an evidence-taking session on the Elections Bill. I welcome to the meeting George Adam, the Minister for Parliamentary Business, and his Scottish Government officials. Penny Curtis is deputy director in the elections and freedom of information division, and Iain Hockenhull is the Elections Bill team leader.
I invite the minister to make a short opening statement on the legislative consent memorandum.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Martin Whitfield
Thank you for those opening remarks. There are a number of areas of questioning that members will lead on according to their interests, but I will kick off by looking at the strategy and policy statement that is proposed for the Electoral Commission. You have already explained why the Scottish Government thinks that devolved elections should not be part of that. What discussions have you had with the UK Government on the proposed strategy and policy statement and can you share any outcome with us?