The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1790 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 6 October 2022
Martin Whitfield
For our second agenda item, I welcome representatives of a proposed cross-party group on the Scots language. Good morning to Jackie Dunbar and to Emma Harper, who join us at the far end of the table. I will hand over to them to give us a short introduction on the proposed CPG.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 6 October 2022
Martin Whitfield
Excellent. The clerks will pass that information on in due course.
09:50 Meeting continued in private until 10:43.Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 6 October 2022
Martin Whitfield
As convener, I always get to ask one exciting question. From the evidence that we have heard today, you are using Scots as a collective description for several minority—perhaps unfairly so—languages in Scotland. Am I right in thinking that you are looking at the scope of minority languages covered by the term “Scots”? I love the fact that groups such as the Doric Society have signed up. I am just looking for clarification that it is about not just what we, in the south of Scotland, would call our lowland Scots, but is about Scots in the proper, collective definition.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 6 October 2022
Martin Whitfield
Welcome and important.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 6 October 2022
Martin Whitfield
Absolutely.
Do members agree to accord recognition to the proposed CPG?
Members indicated agreement.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 6 October 2022
Martin Whitfield
Good morning. I welcome everyone to the 19th meeting of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee in 2022. Our first agenda item is a decision on whether to take items 4 and 5 in private. Do committee members agree to that?
Members indicated agreement.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 6 October 2022
Martin Whitfield
That is very helpful. Thank you, both, for attending the committee this morning. We will consider the application for the proposed CPG as our next agenda item. The clerks will be in touch with you in due course.
Item 3 is a decision on whether to approve the new cross-party group.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 6 October 2022
Martin Whitfield
Thank you very much indeed. I open it up to questions from the committee.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2022
Martin Whitfield
That is interesting. I mean no disrespect, but I have never envisaged the proxy voting happening just in the chamber. I was thinking of people who, at present, are joining through BlueJeans and making their point of order afterwards. How strange that is. There is a change or difference of experience in this place.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2022
Martin Whitfield
I agree and I think that we need to look at that and possibly discuss it further. People talk with dread about such situations, because of the various planning bills and traffic regulations in the past. Are there any further comments about the letter or are we happy for the trial to be not less than 12 months? I think that we need to have enough data to decide how we go forward. We are talking about the eligibility for a proxy vote including maternity, paternity and bereavement leave. Are we happy with the phrase “serious illness”? Do we want just “illness”?