The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2076 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Before you move on, Sue, I just want to ask Gordon Martin something. Kenneth Meechan has said that Glasgow actively tries to answer freedom of information requests as soon as possible, and it is not a case of waiting until day 19. Is that your experience with other industries, or do you frequently wait until day 15 or 16 and then get a request for clarification?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
A very short one.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
We will look at that issue in subsequent questions. Gordon Martin, would the bill’s provisions add to openness?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Chris Milne, you mentioned university spin-offs. What happens with the GDPR officer in relation to them? Do they use the university officer? Obviously, there is a trigger point when the spin-off becomes its own company, but what happens in the transitional period?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
With regard to the environment of openness in public authorities in practice, do you not think that the bill would allow them to take the next step? As you said, you and those you represent are very open in your responses, but do you not think that it would aid all public authorities to take a step towards being more open with the people who, in effect, fund them?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Emma Roddick is finished, so I will come back to you, Sue.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
I thank both witnesses. If there is anything that comes to mind afterwards, you know how to get in touch with us. I hope that you do not mind—particularly Fiona—if we come back to you with other questions in the near future. Thank you for your evidence today.
At this stage I release Ruth Maguire from the committee as we move the meeting into private.
10:33 Meeting continued in private until 10:58.Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is fine.
We move to questions from Katy Clark.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is helpful. Would Sue Webber like to ask anything else?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
I want to delve into the roles. Some of the information that the committee heard last week and which has been submitted talks about the records management responsibility. Is it worth looking at bringing together GDPR, FOI and records management? You talked about the architecture that exists in Glasgow, which would, to facilitate the move to proactive publication in a way that was not prohibitive, in effect need to be redesigned.