The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1824 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Martin Whitfield
Good morning, and welcome to the fourth meeting in 2023 of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee. Our first agenda item is a decision on whether to take in private items 4 and 5, as well as future consideration of the recommendations in “A Parliament for All: Report of the Parliament’s Gender Sensitive Audit”. Item 4 is consideration of the recommendations in that report, and item 5 is consideration of evidence that we will hear today from the Commissioner for Ethical Standards in Public Life in Scotland. Do members agree to take those items in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Martin Whitfield
I have a follow-up question that is about the manual, but is also about the whole process. It is interesting that, on the website, there is a single point of entry to a complaint regardless of whether it is about an MSP, a councillor or another person. On my reading of it, that would tend to indicate to people who use the website that the process is the same in all those cases. That is my own entirely subjective view, but the person will know whether they are going to complain about an MSP, a lobbyist or a councillor, and I wonder about the thinking behind having a single point of entry.
Why not allow people to see the differentiation that exists? We have seen evidence that the approach can cause confusion further down the line. Why was that approach chosen? Would you reconsider it—or, indeed, are you reconsidering it?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Martin Whitfield
There are a couple of things to say in conclusion. I would like to turn to the public appointments side because, although it does not get as much airplay as other matters, it is a crucial role that sits with you. Some serious questions have been raised about how diversification in public appointments has gone or not gone. Will you comment on the changes? There is a full account in the annual report, but perhaps you would talk about how it has changed since the tail end of last year—since the report that we are looking at—and what your hopes are for it in the future.
10:45Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Martin Whitfield
That gives us hope for the future. As you say, it is far from a concluded effort; perhaps it is an effort that should be on-going and never concluded. It is becoming apparent that the age of appointees is an issue. Would you like to comment on the lack of younger people putting themselves forward for such roles, which are very important for the communities that the various public appointments interact with?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Martin Whitfield
That is helpful. I think that you have offered to share the staff planning document, which would be useful—
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Martin Whitfield
That explanation is helpful. I echo your words about ambition—it would be good for there to be ambition about what can be achieved in a number of different areas.
I have a short technical question. A criticism that has been levelled with regard to the financial reports from auditors is that the next 12 months is fine but planning for the medium and long term leaves a little to be desired, if I can put it that way. Obviously, you are cognisant of that criticism. Do you hope to improve that in the very near future, either before the next report or perhaps even sooner?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Martin Whitfield
But you are not saying no.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Martin Whitfield
Bob Doris has a follow-up question.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2023
Martin Whitfield
I am grateful. With that, I move the meeting into private session.
09:31 Meeting continued in private until 11:18.Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2023
Martin Whitfield
Good morning, and welcome to the third meeting in 2023 of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee.
Our first agenda item is a decision on taking business in private. Does the committee agree to take in private items 2, 3, 4 and 5; future consideration of procedures on consent in relation to United Kingdom Parliament bills; and future consideration of parliamentary privilege? Item 2 is procedures on consent in relation to UK Parliament bills; item 3 is consideration of a paper on parliamentary privilege; item 4 is consideration of correspondence that we have received from the Presiding Officer; and item 5 is for the committee to review its work programme. Are members in agreement to take those matters in private?
Members indicated agreement.