The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2357 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Martin Whitfield
That is fine.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Martin Whitfield
You used the acronym MAPPA, which has appeared in chunks of our evidence. Would you like to explain what that is, rather than who it is?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Martin Whitfield
I will explore that in a bit more detail. Some notifications arise from a criminal conviction under schedule 3, as you described, but sexual risk orders are also civil orders. Is that right?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Martin Whitfield
I thank you for that—that is exactly one of the purposes of bringing experts in to give evidence. I thank you, your colleagues and Police Scotland generally.
I now move the meeting into private session.
10:04 Meeting continued in private until 11:02.Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Martin Whitfield
That is what I was going to ask about. Therefore, there would have to be additional evidence that related to the period after the issuing of the first order, and common sense says that, if there was not that evidence, it is unlikely that that would be pursued, unless there was a very cunning reason for that. However, it would be the subsequent behaviour that would be looked at by the courts and, if it was appropriate, that would come under the new scheme of notification.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Martin Whitfield
If the decision is taken not to discharge those orders, those would continue. In that case, would the individual then have a right—
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Martin Whitfield
Good morning. Welcome all to the 21st meeting in 2024 of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee. I have received apologies from Annie Wells this morning.
Agenda item 1 is to decide whether to take items 2, 3 and 4 in private. Item 2 is consideration of correspondence on the Scottish Elections (Representation and Reform) Bill from the Minister for Parliamentary Business; item 3 is consideration of correspondence on strengthening net zero scrutiny arrangements; and item 4 is consideration of an update on a meeting with the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Are members happy to take those items in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Martin Whitfield
Excellent.
09:30 Meeting continued in private until 10:22.Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Martin Whitfield
That is helpful. To echo what the committee has already said, we are in agreement with the basic principle, but the second that we delve into it, we are confronted with more questions than answers. Given the importance of the matter for individual voters’ trust in democracy, it is an important issue to consider.
As there are no further questions on that point, I will turn to the matter of the Electoral Management Board for Scotland. Thank you for your comprehensive coverage of that in your letters. I would like to pick up on a couple of areas in those letters, the first of which relates to the proposed constitution. You have set out the areas that the constitution would need to cover. Is there anything further that would assist the committee with regard to this matter?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Martin Whitfield
With regard to disqualification, at the minute, when someone puts their name forward for election, they go through a short period of time when there can be notices saying that they cannot stand for election for reasons X, Y and Z. The difference in this case is that, even if that does not happen, the person could still never stand for election. The point is the stage at which that becomes apparent and what the challenges are. It is clear from your evidence this morning, for which I thank you, that there is real complexity in this matter, with the potential for an extension to, in effect, a non-criminal order. The challenge lies in the detail.
You mentioned the Venice commission. Is it the Scottish Government’s view that elected individuals at local authority level and here in Parliament should be held to the same standards, rather than there being the nuance that you hinted at with regard to the Venice commission?