Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 18 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2081 contributions

|

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Elections (Representation and Reform) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Martin Whitfield

Would it help if there was an explanation of the sort of grounds that would lead to a postponement? Would it be helpful from your point of view if there was a clarification of the test that the Presiding Officer had to apply?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Elections (Representation and Reform) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Martin Whitfield

I will pose a problem with the pilots. If the board is added as an initiator, it might be challenging for regions to say no to the board.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Elections (Representation and Reform) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Martin Whitfield

It is always on election day that it happens.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Elections (Representation and Reform) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Martin Whitfield

That is very helpful.

It seems that the committee has finished its questioning. I remind our witnesses that, once they have had an opportunity to consider their evidence, the offer is there if they would like to write to us, particularly on the one matter that we have raised, in which case we look forward to receiving that further information.

I thank our witnesses for their attendance and their contributions, both beforehand, in the call for evidence, and during this meeting.

10:34 Meeting continued in private until 11:04.  

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Elections (Representation and Reform) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Martin Whitfield

Thank you. I absolutely respect that there is a policy element in contrast to the implementation aspect.

You said that one possible amendment would involve individuals having limited leave to remain for the full period of the proposed office. Are you able to comment on whether that is a practical solution, given that those who are granted limited leave to remain are given varied periods of time and that there is certainly no consideration of electoral office cycles in that discussion?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Elections (Representation and Reform) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Martin Whitfield

No, I appreciate that.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Elections (Representation and Reform) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Martin Whitfield

I have no problem with that.

The proposal received significant support in the committee’s consultation on the bill and, prior to that, in the Government’s consultation on electoral reform. Malcolm Burr, leaving aside any problem with the policy decision, you see there being two practical problems with the proposal. Probably the most concerning would be a rise in the number of by-elections, which cost money and are problematic within the structure. The other problem relates to being able to identify, at the time of an election, whether there is likely to be a problem coming down the line with limited leave either expiring or being rescinded. Your comments are very helpful.

I will now hand you over—throw you on the mercy of—the committee. I go to Stephen Kerr first, and then to Ivan McKee, who will carry on with the next block of questions.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Elections (Representation and Reform) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Martin Whitfield

Is there a resource implication, or is it a principle that returning officers should accept what is presented to them by an individual or the supporting team around them?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Elections (Representation and Reform) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Martin Whitfield

Would it be helpful or otherwise if postponement, rather than just being a pause for a period, reset the clock? Let us say we were four weeks into what is colloquially called the short campaign and there was a postponement for a period. When the clock restarted, would it make any difference from a practical point of view if you had to deliver within the remaining two weeks or restart the full six-week short campaign?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Elections (Representation and Reform) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Martin Whitfield

I will explore that a little bit. If you are not in a position to advise at the moment, I am more than happy for you to come back to us in writing. Do you think that time should, in essence, freeze during a postponement, with no additional people being allowed to come on to the register, or would it be better to accept that the passage of time during a postponement means that people are entitled to come on to and, indeed, come off the register? From an administrative, non-policy position, which would be the best approach?