The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1487 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 10 February 2022
Martin Whitfield
Please move on to those, Bob.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 10 February 2022
Martin Whitfield
That is helpful.
There are a few fairly specific points on which I would benefit from your opinion, relating to requests that were made in the Deloitte report. The report contains a section where Deloitte has numbered some recommendations, along with the responses both from you and from others. Towards the end of that section, the report mentions engagement
“with the SPCB and Parliament to determine the reporting route for concerns about a Commissioner.”
Would you like to take the opportunity to comment on that? The management’s response in October 2021 said:
“Agreed although all we can do is engage with the SPCB following the publication of this report.”
As you say, you “have no locus” in respect of that. How did you feel about being asked to do something that was not your locus? Other than being able to ask about it, there is nothing much that you can do about it.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 10 February 2022
Martin Whitfield
Therefore, you are not saying absolutely no to an external adviser, or whatever they would be called. However, in some sense, that is not the question that is immediately in front of you, without a manual, and there are other factors that play into that with regard to the independence of the commissioner, the independence of the commissioner when those decisions were made and the protections that are built in, in respect of councillor complaints to the commission and in respect of MSP complaints to this committee. There is a structure, and the issue is how such a review would interrelate with that structure and, indeed, the statutory requirements of independence. Is that fair?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 10 February 2022
Martin Whitfield
That is very helpful. It is right to say, for the record, that the Deloitte report, although it was not published until October, covers the period up to the end of March 2021, which was the point at which you became acting commissioner.
What is your current assessment of your office’s capacity to move forward?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 10 February 2022
Martin Whitfield
Item 2 is for the committee to agree whether its consideration of its approach to a review of the code of conduct should be taken in private at future meetings. Do members agree to take that in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 10 February 2022
Martin Whitfield
Item 3 is for the committee to hear evidence from the acting Commissioner for Ethical Standards in Public Life in Scotland. I welcome Ian Bruce, the acting commissioner.
We move straight to questions. As convener, I will take the privilege of going first.
As acting commissioner, you have published an annual review, which has come to the committee to be addressed. Several other matters are outstanding, not least of which is a section 22 report from the Auditor General for Scotland. There is also a report from Deloitte, which I understand was produced at the request of the commissioner. We will look at some aspects of all of those and hope to clarify some issues that have come up.
Concerns about the effectiveness of the office’s statutory functions were revealed by your auditor and raised by the Auditor General. What actions have you and your senior colleagues taken to address those concerns since you took up your position as acting commissioner?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 10 February 2022
Martin Whitfield
I am sorry to interrupt, Tess, but Sue Webber wants to come in on one of Ian Bruce’s answers.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 10 February 2022
Martin Whitfield
That is very kind.
Before I hand over to Collette Stevenson, I will state the obvious, because it needs to be stated. Mr Bruce, when you were talking about devolving the investigations of MSP complaints to your staff, you were talking about devolving the process. The actual decision on whether there is a breach rests with you as an independent commissioner, in your role as acting commissioner, and those final decisions are always taken by you, based on all the evidence that is presented to you following an investigation. That would be right, would it not?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 3 February 2022
Martin Whitfield
The next proposed CPG is on migration. I welcome to the meeting Paul Sweeney MSP, who is the proposed convener of the new group. Would you like to make an opening statement on the intentions of the CPG, Paul?
09:45Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 3 February 2022
Martin Whitfield
I note that Christine Ryder from Outside the Box, which I understand is a facilitating charity, has offered secretariat support but is not listed as one of the non-MSP members of the group. Is that because it is just offering secretariat support and facilitation, rather than contributing to the content of the CPG?