The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2076 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Under agenda item 2, we return to our evidence gathering on the Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill. We are joined by Katy Clark MSP, who introduced the bill.
I welcome Gordon Martin, regional organiser and lead officer for CalMac Ferries, National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers; and Dr Kenneth Meechan, head of information and data protection officer for Glasgow City Council.
We will move directly to questions, and, as is the convener’s privilege, I will go first. My first question relates to the policy memorandum that sits behind the bill. The bill’s principal aim is to
“improve transparency by strengthening existing measures”
in the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002, and to deliver recommendations from the report of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee in the previous parliamentary session. Gordon Martin, how timely are the changes and are they needed?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Kenneth, can you share with us the major reason for refusals, if it is not commercial sensitivity? What requests for information are you being confronted with that cannot be disclosed by your front-line units?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Do you think that the current public messaging about the importance of FOI—which ties into the importance of proper records management—is sufficiently strong to say that any hint of a deliberate attempt to alter or to prevent someone accessing information would be frowned on? Is that enough without the need for explicit primary legislation saying that that is a criminal offence?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is helpful.
We move to questions from Katy Clark.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is fine.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
I am sorry, Sue, but I think that Ruth Maguire has a little follow-up question for Kenneth Meechan.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Welcome back. I welcome our second panel of witnesses. Chris Milne is former chair of the Scottish higher education information practitioners group, and Fiona Stuart, who joins us online, is a member of the Law Society of Scotland’s privacy sub-committee. We will move straight to questions, if that is all right.
Fiona Stuart, the policy memorandum talks about the bill’s aims
“to improve transparency in Scotland by strengthening existing measures in the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002”,
and to deliver recommendations that came, some time ago, from the Parliament in the previous session. How timely are those reforms now?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Thank you. Chris Milne, is the bill timely?
10:00Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Thank you, Fiona. You have provided the perfect contents page for our questions.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Thank you. You got away lightly there, Emma—well done. We look forward to the Law Society’s response.
Chris, I go back to the question for clarification on the change of definition and the presumption. Would you and those you represent be confident that, if the provision was restated in the same terms, that would give you confidence that those you speak for understand what the expectation is? If the bill becomes law and even just changes it slightly, we could get into an area of uncertainty that could lead to problems of interpretation. Have I understood that correctly?