Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 26 January 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2089 contributions

|

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 November 2025

Martin Whitfield

So, it is just belt and braces.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 November 2025

Martin Whitfield

Thank you for your patience, Katy. I will now hand over to you.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 November 2025

Martin Whitfield

One of the examples that the Parliament looks at is lobbying.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 November 2025

Martin Whitfield

I am not convinced that the argument that you are presenting—that the Parliament is incapable of doing the preparatory work—is as strong as is being relied on, but I understand the evidence that you have put forward.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 November 2025

Martin Whitfield

I want to clarify a couple of things. Section 2(1) would require the Government to take heed of the commissioner’s proposals. I presume that the Government has no concerns about that, because you have just asserted that you would always listen to the commissioner, which should mean that any obligation or requirement on the Scottish Government to respond to such proposals would therefore not be too big a step for the Government to take.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 November 2025

Martin Whitfield

Does the Government accept that there is not a challenge in being required to consider a proposal from the commissioner, which would therefore result in a requirement to respond that?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 November 2025

Martin Whitfield

You mentioned in your opening statement the support that the Government is willing to provide with regard to assisting with shortcomings in the bill. I welcome that on behalf of the committee and, of course, the wider Parliament. Is the bill not the vehicle to conduct that primary legislative change?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 November 2025

Martin Whitfield

That is helpful. Thank you.

If you wish to add anything, Paul, just jump in.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 November 2025

Martin Whitfield

Would it also develop the relationship between the requester and the answerer, in terms of the actual problem, and perhaps promote support for freedom of information among the public?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 November 2025

Martin Whitfield

That will happen when the space appears. I am trying to clarify that. If you want to write to the committee regarding that, that is fine.

My final question is for you, minister, and it is about the proposal to involve Parliament in designating public bodies. In essence, there is a concern that the process currently takes too long, and the proposal is, in part, driven by frustration with how long it takes. If Parliament is not the appropriate vehicle, how are we going to curtail the length of time that it takes to designate? I mean that in the widest sense.