The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1227 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Sharon Dowey
Hamish, do you have any comments?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Sharon Dowey
I come back to Gillian Reilly. The committee received a written submission from Glasgow ADP, which mentioned that
“Healthcare teams are overwhelmed by an open referral system and caseloads that outweigh community service.”
Can you tell us a wee bit more about the open referral system and how that impacts on healthcare teams?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Sharon Dowey
Yes.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Sharon Dowey
Thank you for that. I will pass back to the convener now.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Sharon Dowey
I have a small question for Dr Graham about help and support within prisons. The written submission from SHAAP mentions that 6 per cent of respondents in the 2024 prisoner survey who had received support for alcohol consumption when they arrived in prison said that it was helpful but 3 per cent who had received support said that it was not helpful. Do you have any more detail on why they did not think that it was helpful?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Sharon Dowey
Can you comment further on why there are inconsistencies? All the prison estate is now run by the SPS. We have heard a few times that there are issues with prisoners on remand. Do you have any insight into what the inconsistencies are, and are you aware of any work that is being done to address the issue with prisoners on remand?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Sharon Dowey
I am interested in what you said about 24-hour cover. Is there enough cover at weekends and in the evenings?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Sharon Dowey
The Minister for Victims and Community Safety has recently written to the committee to give the Government’s views on the bill. In her letter, she states that the proposal requires
“further discussion and engagement with justice partners”.
Other comments suggest that the Government might not be supportive of the bill. What is your response to that correspondence?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Sharon Dowey
I will not ask too many questions, but I have one further comment, which is similar to what Liam Kerr said earlier. The minister said:
“there are again opportunities to progress this area through non-legislative measures”.
However, you think that your bill is required. You mentioned the 2021 act, which has not been implemented.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Sharon Dowey
Amendment 59 would ensure that, when deciding whether there should be a national jurisdiction calling from custody, there must be consideration of the
“individual circumstances of the case”
by the Lord Advocate or procurator fiscal. That could include circumstances such the travelling time and expense incurred by victims, witnesses, the defence and the prosecution. Amendment 59 addresses the various practical issues related to the travel and cost implications of national jurisdiction that were raised by stakeholders such as Victim Support Scotland, the Law Society of Scotland, the Scottish Solicitors Bar Association, the Edinburgh Bar Association and Police Scotland.
From my recent discussions on the bill with Victim Support Scotland, I know that it is keen to ensure that there would be no undue burdens on the ability of victims and witnesses to travel. Victim Support Scotland emphasised that victims cannot be expected to travel long distances and take additional time out of their day to attend court. There needs to be a strong consideration of expanding the options for remote evidence, including the acceptable locations from which witnesses can give evidence, which my colleague Liam Kerr’s amendments have tried to deal with. Amendment 59 would simply require that all circumstances in an individual case must be considered before making a national jurisdiction calling from custody. It aims to ensure that there is no unfair burden on any one of the parties who are involved.
