The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1368 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Sharon Dowey
Effectively, we are still no further forward. Your officers will still not be able to leave somebody without there being an alternative. The NHS has not really made any progress, then.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Sharon Dowey
Because it is a health issue.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Sharon Dowey
What further action would be taken if people did not pay the fixed penalty?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Sharon Dowey
I appreciate that the level of fine is going up because of inflation, which seems to make sense, but has the Government any concerns that the number of people who do not pay will also go up because of that increase in cost?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Sharon Dowey
The police have not used those powers in the past year, so what is the reason for removing the offences rather than keeping them in?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Sharon Dowey
It just seems that removing the offences will add more paperwork to a system that is already under pressure. I still do not understand why the charges need to be taken out of the scheme; I do not think that it would make any difference if they were to be kept in.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Sharon Dowey
Good morning. You mentioned the framework for collaboration, in which you say that you are promoting
“a multi-agency collaborative approach to improving local distress pathways, with the person-centred, trauma-informed and no wrong door principles at the heart of the improvement.”
That all sounds really good, but the Scottish Police Federation has said that
“the ‘handover’ between police and health functions is, at best broken, at worst, non-existent”.
What are you doing to address that problem right now? You seem to be having lots of meetings, and there are lots of groups, but the police need action right now to ensure that handovers, especially at hospitals, happen on a 24/7 basis, not just from 9 to 5, Monday to Friday. What are you doing to take the pressure off the police force when it comes to people who have a mental health problem? You say that you are trying to reduce stigma, but I do not think that it helps if those people are held by police officers; they would probably much prefer to be with a health professional. What are you doing to address that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Sharon Dowey
Sorry—did you say that it is being created? Is it not created yet?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Sharon Dowey
Why is that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Sharon Dowey
Good morning. Do you anticipate there being a need for additional in-year resource funding during the rest of this financial year or in 2026-27? Given your previous answer, it sounds as though you think that there will be a need for that. Could you expand on your response?