The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1114 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Sharon Dowey
Can I ask another quick question, convener?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Sharon Dowey
Fifty-six days is quite a long time. When you get the initial report, would you not expect to get a statement from the person that has been accused of the crime so that you can get their version of events?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Sharon Dowey
Should access to the list be limited?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Sharon Dowey
My question follows on from the questions that you have already been asked. I am interested in timescales. You said that there is sometimes, when an allegation about police officers comes to you, already evidence that the allegation might be malicious, so they are put to you straight away. What is the timescale for, for example, getting evidence on a complaint from somebody who has been arrested and said that excessive force has been used? Such complaints come straight to you, but what is the timescale for getting evidence?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Sharon Dowey
Right. I know that we have to hold the police to a higher standard, but do you think that the police being obliged to report to your department once a complaint of criminality is made, regardless of whether there is sufficient evidence, is an effective system?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Sharon Dowey
Does that mean that the person who I spoke about who was not told why he was being put on restricted duties should really have been told why at the time and a statement should have been taken?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Sharon Dowey
On sections 4 to 8 of the bill, which cover aspects of police conduct, the bill allows for the functions that will be conferred on the PIRC to be amended. That is an enabling power only, and details of the functions are not provided in the bill. The bill provides a power to allow gross misconduct procedures to be applied to former police officers and to amend the misconduct procedures for senior police officers—again, further details would be provided in secondary legislation. Does it concern you that more details are not provided in the bill? Do you have any concerns about that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Sharon Dowey
Will there be a substantial increase in the resources that are required from you, or will the finances just move from one body to another?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2024
Sharon Dowey
Good. Convener, can I—
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2024
Sharon Dowey
David Kennedy mentioned the case of Rhona Malone. We heard from a witness who was put on restricted duties and told that he was a danger to the public but was not informed why. He went all the way through a criminal case and was acquitted, by which point he had already taken early retirement.
Why do you do the criminal case first and not do a misconduct or an internal disciplinary investigation? It probably goes back to your procedures but, if that had been done at the time for him, it would have been found that there was no evidence, it would have been dealt with internally and court time would have been saved.