The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1235 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee, Health Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 14 November 2024
Sharon Dowey
You are considering them just now, so you cannot say that you fully accept them.
Criminal Justice Committee, Health Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 14 November 2024
Sharon Dowey
In response to my previous questions, the national mission was mentioned. However, at our previous evidence session, the issue of an implementation gap between legislation, policy and strategy and what is being felt by people on the ground was raised. That has also been an area of interest for the people’s panel. Why do you think that there is a perceived implementation gap, and what is the Scottish Government doing about it?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 14 November 2024
Sharon Dowey
Mr Foggo mentioned earlier that I had said that it was “buzzword bingo” today. I have not heard that phrase before, but I am sure that I will use it in the future.
As committees, we are interested in seeing action that ensures that we end up with improved results. It would be good to ensure that we do not simply talk about strategies but actually see them being implemented, so I would like to get more evidence on that.
Criminal Justice Committee, Health Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 14 November 2024
Sharon Dowey
That sounds good, and there are a lot of buzzwords in there. You said that there is a record amount of funding going into ADPs, but the report says that
“ADPs have seen an eight per cent decrease in real terms”.
We are putting a lot of money in, but we are not seeing any improvement in the figures—the numbers of people who are actually losing their lives.
Are you telling me, “Right—we’ve cut money for the ADPs, but we’ve now directed money to somewhere else and that’s why we are seeing a cut for ADPs”? Can you tell us about any specific actions that you are taking in that regard?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 14 November 2024
Sharon Dowey
The report also lists three areas in drug services where progress has been particularly slow: publishing a mental health and substance use protocol; delivering a stigma action plan; and implementing a drugs and alcohol workforce action plan. Will you give us an update on the progress on those and the reasons for the slow progress? Again, a lot of money is going into this, and many other areas would love to have that budget. What progress are we making, and why is it so slow?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 14 November 2024
Sharon Dowey
The report says:
“Funding for tackling alcohol and drug harm has more than doubled over the last ten years”,
but it goes on to say:
“However, ADPs have seen an eight per cent decrease in real terms funding over the last two years”,
It also states:
“The Scottish Government has yet to undertake an evaluation of the costs and effectiveness of alcohol and drug services to determine if they are delivering value for money”,
and it highlights as important the need to ensure
“that ... funding is directed in the most effective way.”
I have heard people describe the funding landscape as like spaghetti: when they try to find help or a pathway, there are a lot of groups that are trying to help people, but it can be confusing. What is the Scottish Government doing to ensure that we are putting the funding into the right areas? The level of drug and alcohol deaths in Scotland is still far too high.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Sharon Dowey
Good morning, cabinet secretary. The SPS advised the committee that it was in discussions with the Scottish Government over an additional in-year funding requirement of £20 million this year. Will you give us an update on whether that will be available for the SPS?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Sharon Dowey
Partly—I might have more questions on that. At what stage would you take biometric data?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Sharon Dowey
In its evidence, the SPS also said that it was carrying out its own pilot for body-worn cameras. It stated that early signs indicate that the pilot has impacted staff safety. Obviously, with high prisoner numbers, that is really important. If the pilot is successful once it is complete, SPS would require to make a budgetary submission to the Scottish Government. Has the SPS had any conversations with you about the pilot and the budgetary request? If so, do you expect to be able to give it to the SPS in next year’s budget?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Sharon Dowey
That probably leads to more questions because we have lower police numbers and, for some crimes, they say that there is no evidence that they can follow, so the crimes are not getting investigated. That might mean that there is no DNA to follow, because the police have not taken fingerprints for a minor crime. That would perhaps open up more questions for me.
