The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1235 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Sharon Dowey
Is the report available?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Sharon Dowey
Thank you.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Sharon Dowey
Was the issue a lack of understanding on the board or a lack of guidance from the Scottish Government? If the board knew in 2019 that the change was going to happen, why did it not take action?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Sharon Dowey
Audit Scotland does the audits and we have found that the recommendations do not seem to be implemented quickly. That recommendation was made in 2018. I know that we have had the pandemic, but we did not have it in 2018 or 2019. It would help Audit Scotland if we were a wee bit more timely about trying to action the recommendations that the auditors make from their audits.
Are the principles being applied in current decision-making processes in the Scottish Government? I am thinking about ScotRail with that question.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Sharon Dowey
Paragraphs 41 and 43 of the report say that the Scottish Government should
“clearly outline its plans for future investment in private companies to ensure there is greater transparency over financial support provided and the value of public funds committed”
and that it has committed to develop
“a framework to outline its principles and approach for decisions about future investment in private companies.”
When will that framework be published?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Sharon Dowey
Thank you.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Sharon Dowey
I am a bit worried about the word “intent”. That the intent is to publish the framework at the end of March does not mean that it will be published then.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 10 February 2022
Sharon Dowey
The Auditor General touched on my first questions in his opening statement. Paragraphs 8 and 9 of the report state:
“SEPA commissioned independent reviews of the cyber-attack so that it, and the wider public sector, could learn lessons.”
The reviews concluded
“that SEPA had a high level of cyber security maturity, but further improvements could be made”.
They also
“made 44 recommendations for SEPA”
to take forward
“to enhance processes and controls in relation to information security.”
Given that SEPA was found to have a high level of security maturity, 44 recommendations seems to be a lot. How likely is it that other public sector organisations that are also considered to have a high level of security maturity are at risk from a similar cyberattack? Have all the recommendations been passed over, and is SEPA taking action on them?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 10 February 2022
Sharon Dowey
Good morning, Auditor General. The committee has seen a lot of reports, but this is probably one of the most damning. Your comments in the report that
“The Scottish Government has not provided the necessary leadership for progress”
and
“Current arrangements are unlikely to achieve the ambitions for skills alignment at the pace required”
raise a lot of concern. The report states that the
“intended benefits of skills alignment ... have not been realised and the opportunity for more efficient and effective investment has been missed.”
I appreciate that this might be hard to quantify, but do you have any information on what the largely failed project has cost the public purse or, indeed, on what the opportunity costs have been as a result of the catalogue of errors outlined in the report?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 10 February 2022
Sharon Dowey
I think that you are right—the issue is the lost opportunity to bring benefits.
The report highlights that, although the Scottish Government made a commitment to skills alignment, there was a complete absence of strategic intent or a performance management framework to measure progress. Why were those fundamental elements not put in place? To what extent has that led to the significant lack of progress in skills alignment that is highlighted in your report?