The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1368 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Sharon Dowey
Is there still an issue with access to help outwith normal working hours of Monday to Friday and 9 to 5? Are there pinch points in the evenings or at weekends, or have improvements been made in the past couple of years?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Sharon Dowey
Are there any best-practice models? In England, there is the right care, right person model. I do not know whether you are aware of that.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Sharon Dowey
Is there anything that could be learned from other places about models that could be brought in and implemented quickly so that we can see the benefit?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Sharon Dowey
How can Police Scotland improve the handover at hospitals? That is my initial question. Also, are there things that might make it possible to not take the call in the first place? We have talked about various things, including using 101. ACC Paton, you said that, if there is no threat to life, police must be able to step back. What is it that police officers are scared of? Are they risk averse? Are they scared that they will not get support from higher-up officers? Is it that, if something were to happen, they would get the blame for it? How can we improve the handover, and how can we improve the confidence of police officers to leave someone whose life is not at risk?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Sharon Dowey
Would the fine simply be written off?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Sharon Dowey
I agree with the cost going up, but do you think that more people will not pay the fines because of that? Is there a concern about that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Sharon Dowey
I have just one question on the two unused offences. They have been removed from the regime, so where do those offences now fall?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Sharon Dowey
Where do the two unused offences that have been removed now fall? I think that you said in your opening statement that, in the final year for which there are figures, two offences had not been used and will now be removed from the regime. Where will they now fall?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Sharon Dowey
Are they now classed as more serious crimes, so that an offender would get a more serious penalty instead of just a fixed-penalty notice?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Sharon Dowey
I will come back to the two offences that are being removed from the scheme, and my question follows on from what Pauline McNeill asked. It is only in the past two years that the offences have not been used. They are tools in the toolbox, but if they are taken away, the only option left will be to charge, which would take up police and court time and create paperwork.
I still do not understand why we should remove those two offences from the scheme. Would it not be better to keep them in so that the police can use them, rather than take them out and leave only the option of spending more time in court and having more prison sentences?