The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1530 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Carol Mochan
I will start with a quote from my colleague Rhoda Grant, who has said before in the chamber:
“We all know that fish know no boundaries and, because of that, negotiations have always taken place on fisheries.”—[Official Report, 30 April 2025; c 70-1.]
That is a very good place to start. If we are to help to protect the future of our fishing industry, we must learn to negotiate and, of course, work together. It seems to me that the Parliament wants to support the industry and indeed believes that we need to do so. How we work together will make a great deal of difference. The Government motion recognises the need for
“continued investment to build a thriving, sustainable and modern fishing industry, which is of key importance to Scotland’s island and coastal communities and the wider economy”.
I think that we all want to work towards that.
Across the UK, we are deeply fortunate to live on a spectacular and unique island that is furnished with an incredible coastline that, for centuries, has provided us with food, employment and leisure. The environmental wealth that is present across Scotland’s coast is abundant and, without it, our entire culture would be altogether different. I am immensely thankful for that environment. From speaking to my constituents, I know that it is perhaps the thing that they love and value most about the South Scotland region, and that is why I speak in the debate today.
My constituents love the history of the coastal and fishing industry and the environment within which it functions, and they enjoy the chance to improve their towns and economy that comes with the industry. Of course, I recognise that the industry has had complex difficulties over many years in relation to quotas, funding across the UK, Brexit and other worldwide matters that are often turbulent. I think that we can all agree that the fishing industry deserves stability, and it is by working together that we might get that.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Carol Mochan
It is fair to say that we need to think about what happened. My colleague Torcuil Crichton, the MP for the Western Isles, has also spoken to the Labour Government in the UK. Rather than fighting across the chamber, we need to talk about what we can do to move forward.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Carol Mochan
Right, no bother. I appreciate your time. Thanks very much.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Carol Mochan
I want to touch on the definition of “wellbeing”. The Scottish Government consulted on whether there should be such a definition alongside the national outcomes. What is the minister’s view of the definition in the bill?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Carol Mochan
To be clear—do you think that the definition does not need to be in both the bill and the framework or that it would be confusing if it were in both?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Carol Mochan
Can I just have a wee bit of clarity? You might have touched on this already. The bill seeks to link directly the definition of “sustainable development” with the definition of “wellbeing”. The committee has heard concerns that the definitions could go into statute without explicit reference being made to environmental limits. Would the minister agree with that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Carol Mochan
Thank you—that was a helpful point about inquiries versus investigations.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Carol Mochan
The bill allows the commissioner to
“take such steps as the Commissioner considers appropriate”
when seeking to resolve a matter without recourse to an investigation. Given that you have said that the powers are similar to those of your office, what would those steps look like?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Carol Mochan
Overall, what opportunities would arise from a commissioner being required to
“keep under review the law, policy and practice relating to wellbeing and sustainable development”?
What might the challenges of that be?
09:45Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Carol Mochan
Some of my other questions are quite similar. In particular, we had evidence that suggested that some of the powers feel more like those of inquiry than investigation and that the ability to investigate could be strengthened. Does anyone have a view on that?