Seòmar agus comataidhean

I really appreciate that intervention. It sounds as if we could put some effort across the Parliament into moving a bit faster for those professions, particularly those that are highlighting to us that they really need this to happen in remote and rural areas.

A debate on rural healthcare cannot be complete without discussing maternity services, and I am sure that other members will raise that. Patients who live in my region of Dumfries and Galloway are all too familiar with the challenges in accessing pathways and services. As has been discussed many times in the chamber, expectant mothers in Stranraer are forced to travel an average of 75 miles or more to deliver their babies. That is unacceptable. The thought of having to make that journey while heavily pregnant makes me nervous, never mind expectant mothers. The Government is aware of that and must do more.

I fully agree with Douglas Ross. He has spoken about that often in the chamber.

On women’s health, accessing something as basic as gynaecological care should not require entire days of travel. The women’s health campaigner Rebecca Wymer has said:

“women make up 51% of Scotland’s population so gynaecology is not specialist care. Gynaecology is a basic human right”.

Therefore, we should have those services in rural areas.

Alcohol consumption remains a prominent problem in Scottish society, but remote and rural communities are particularly disadvantaged when it comes to prevention and support. I hope that we can talk more about that. We should be talking more about the relationship that Scotland has with alcohol.

The Government must listen to the vast number of charities, unions, health boards and patients that are crying out for reform in our rural health services, because one size does not fit all. We are discussing problems with rural NHS services that I think have been exacerbated by poor decision making and governance. We need more honesty about what is actually happening to patients out there. The challenges that are being discussed today are real. In a country that prides itself on universal free healthcare—as I know we all do—it is frankly shocking that this Government has allowed things to get so bad. I hope that we can work to get things done, because the situation is not good enough at the moment.

I know that Emma Harper takes the issue seriously, but we would all agree that it is not safe for women to have to travel across the country on the A75 in that condition. We must be more honest about that.

A recent Audit Scotland report on alcohol and drug services recommended that the Scottish Government increase funding to tackle alcohol-related harm by mid-2025. However, the budget indicates that those services received a real-terms funding cut. How does the Scottish Government respond to Alcohol Focus Scotland’s assessment that

“the budget in its current form is ... lacking in the ambition and determination needed to tackle Scotland’s alcohol emergency”?

While you were speaking, the opportunity for people who are in training to go to the islands came to my mind. Do you think that more could be done in that regard so that people see the benefits of the work that is done there, and also the lifestyle, which they might be interested in?

For me, as a member of the Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, our inquiry into remote and rural healthcare painted a sobering picture. Patients who live in such areas face unique challenges in accessing healthcare, so I welcome the debate, which will enable us to have an open and frank discussion about the harsh realities that are experienced by so many Scots who live in those areas.

The oral and written evidence that the committee received only reinforced what we—and, I believe, the Government—already knew: that remote, rural and island communities experience greater inequalities in accessing healthcare when compared with communities in urban and central areas. The fact that someone lives in a remote and rural community should not limit their access to basic and specialist care. Why do cancer patients in remote, rural and island areas receive less specialist care? Why are maternity and gynaecology patients in such areas forced to travel long distances to give birth and attend appointments? Why do communities that have a particularly high elderly population have problems in accessing palliative care and support?

To address those issues and the others that members across the chamber have mentioned, the Government needs to be honest about how bad the situation is for many people in Scotland. The challenges to do with staff recruitment and retention are a major issue across the whole of Scotland, but they are particularly hard felt in rural communities, as we have heard. Even a small number of vacancies can cause huge challenges in running services safely. A lack of suitable training and development opportunities, unattractive pay and conditions, and a lack of access to affordable housing act as significant barriers.

The Government must work with trade unions, local government, professional bodies, training providers and NHS boards to discuss opportunities for creating better training, living and transport flexibility. “Cross-portfolio” does not just mean talking about it—it means actually delivering results across portfolios.

I also urge the Government to consider apprenticeship opportunities—perhaps that is what the cabinet secretary discussed earlier—for healthcare workers across our professions. At a meeting that I held last week, the British Dietetic Association conveyed its willingness to engage with the Government on that and to discuss how greater flexibility could be worked into the system to promote better uptake of apprenticeships in healthcare roles. I wonder whether the cabinet secretary will respond to that in his closing remarks.

Many professionals have raised the issue as a way of recruiting and retaining excellent staff from diverse backgrounds. However, despite what the cabinet secretary said in his opening speech, there seems to be a difference on the ground. Things do not seem to be moving very quickly.

I want to go back to childsmile—I know that it has been mentioned, but I have a question for the minister. I have no doubt that she agrees that we should be doing something about the stark health inequalities in dental health, in particular among children. We know that 60.1 per cent of children who are living in the most deprived areas have no obvious dental decay, in comparison with 83.6 per cent in the least deprived areas. That is a marked difference.

The minister spoke of some good work that is going on. However, I have a frustration with many of the things that we talk about, and in this case with the preventative approach for young children in deprived areas in particular. If good work such as childsmile is going on, why are we unable to target that work and share it across different areas so that we can start to make a difference and ensure that the inequality figure gets smaller?

I want to come back on something that Mr Ferris said. I am familiar with Marmot’s work and with the issue of universalism and targeting. We should not just love to get oral health better but see it as our responsibility to get it better because, until we target the inequalities, there will be difficulties across Scotland. I appreciate how much work has gone into improvement, but we need to see ourselves—I refer to MSPs and the people who are in charge of the relevant section—as having a responsibility to take a targeted approach.

You touched on the cross-portfolio stuff, minister. That is really important if we are to get over the line in tackling health inequalities. Thank you very much for your time.

To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to the reported review of more than 1,000 CT scans, in light of concerns regarding the quality of assessments made by a consultant radiologist. (S6T-02241)

I welcome the immediate action that was taken. However, I seek further clarity on how the discrepancies were allowed to happen, which health boards have been affected and when the affected patients can expect to be notified.