The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 982 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Craig Hoy
Another risk involves devolved social security. Professor Ulph, when you were previously before the committee, you put to us quite interesting and alarming statistics about the refusal rates for adult disability payment being 16 per cent in England and 2 per cent in Scotland. When we put those numbers to the Scottish Government, it said that we were comparing apples and pears and that the difference was something to do with the fact that the benefit was recently devolved. Have you been able to interrogate that data further to show whether it results from a policy approach or the recent devolution of benefits?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Craig Hoy
I presume that the risk is that, if the Government does not meet its 0.5 per cent target, this is all compounding through the system, eventually, because there will be a larger civil service than the Government projected and potentially higher pay than it had included in its pay policy. That is the risk, is it not?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Craig Hoy
Can I interrupt for a second, minister? Paragraph 21 says:
“There are risks in this approach, in that we are setting a stretch target”—
that is, a very ambitious target—
“and cannot, at this time, fully set out to the Minister where the savings will come from. The key issue for this strategy is ensuring the Minister is content with the level of risk between what is fairly secure”—
it has not been tied down—
“and what is assumed to come through the commitments in the strategy.”
It is not a clearly set-out plan, is it?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Craig Hoy
That is super—thank you very much.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Craig Hoy
Would it not be better, logically, to announce the £1 billion figure after you have had all those discussions and identified where the savings are to be made? To return to the initial point, the “headline-grabbing” announcement is not “rooted in realism”, is it?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Craig Hoy
Fine. I will move on from the subject in a couple of seconds, but first I note that one bullet point in the document—unfortunately, the Government’s commitment to transparency is such that it has been redacted in part—highlights to the minister that
“As you will be aware from your bilateral meetings, a number of Cabinet Secretaries have raised considerable concerns”.
What were those “considerable concerns” about announcing £1 billion in public sector efficiency savings?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Craig Hoy
I was going to ask about that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Craig Hoy
That contingency should be built into the spending review. The Scottish Government should be aware that it is a potential real risk to its own financial settlement.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Craig Hoy
We hope that the spending review will start to put down mitigations in respect of the risks that the MTFS identifies.
We have talked about public sector pay. Some of the major areas of public sector pay have already been set for two years, and they are at 7 per cent, which leaves less than 2 per cent. There is an inflation guarantee, but the policy does not account for pay progress or for grade inflation, which I think that we have seen in the civil service. Is that ringing an alarm bell quite loudly for you in respect of the long-term sustainability of Scotland’s public finances?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Craig Hoy
What does it tell you about the culture in the civil service that people are saying that it is an infringement of their human rights to ask them to go to work?