The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1202 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Craig Hoy
There is something a bit fishy about this, is there not? In effect, you have the minister and, in effect, the person who won the contract having one account of this fundamental issue of the builders refund guarantee, and you as the agency responsible were blissfully unaware of that. There is something fishy in this, is there not?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Craig Hoy
It is unconventional.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Craig Hoy
Is there a risk that campaign groups could hijack the planning process in order to slow down what you are saying is an essential infrastructure development?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Craig Hoy
Mr Brannen’s account says that you went to the minister and sought his approval and that you were recommending to proceed with the vessels. That is what you would read into Mr Brannen’s statement, would you not?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Craig Hoy
It is the 24 hours where it appears that you changed your mind. From memory, it was 8 to 9 October. What discussions were you having within the organisation?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Craig Hoy
FMEL told us that it told relevant parties that it could not provide a builders refund guarantee.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Craig Hoy
I have one final question. There are lots of contradictory accounts of what went wrong and why it went wrong, but Jim McColl says that one of the fundamental issues as to why the two vessels have gone so far over budget and so far off track in terms of schedule is your alleged meddling in the construction process. Did you tell FMEL in what order to build things?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 23 June 2022
Craig Hoy
Last time we touched on the matter, you said that you thought the assessment of 1 to 2 per cent for fraud and error was reasonable. How do you come to that conclusion?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 23 June 2022
Craig Hoy
On fraud and error, in certain defined circumstances it might be quite difficult to assess whether a fraudulent claim was made or somebody was simply misinterpreting the rules. For example, the principle is that the ratepayer applies for small business support funding. I heard an example where somebody who was subletting within a broader unit made a claim and then the ratepayer, who was also operating from that unit, made a claim, only to find that the person to whom he sublet some space had got there before him. In those circumstances, it would be difficult to say whether that was fraud or error. Where there are clear-cut cases of fraud, you said that by logic there should be recovery action. Do you have any assessment of how much of that £16 to £32 million will, in effect, be error? In those circumstances, should there be recovery action or will some kind of complex repayment process have to be undertaken?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 23 June 2022
Craig Hoy
We note that, as a result of the Covid pandemic, some degree of prioritisation has been entered into and some of the more complex benefits are due to be delivered at pace over the coming years, including the adult disability payment. Do you believe that the current timetable, which is in exhibit 1, represents a sustainable pace of change? Do you think that it makes sufficient allowance for unforeseen circumstances or for competing priorities, such as the creation of a national care service? Is the timescale credible, or do you think that we will have to perhaps build in time for further delays?