Official Report: search what was said in Parliament
The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
Searching by different views
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
- Report: this is the whole Official Report for a particular meeting of a committee or Parliament
- Item of business: this is each individual agenda item in an Official Report. For example, Portfolio Questions would be the item of business in a Meeting of the Parliament report
- Contribution: this is each time someone has made a spoken contribution to a meeting.
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
Search by MSP
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
Searching by keyword
There are two types of keyword search:
- A keyword search without quotation marks will look for every instance of each word used and rank the results by frequency and proximity. It will also include variants of the keywords using “porter stemming”. This is when the search looks for the “stem” of a word regardless of its ending. So, for example, a search for [salmon farm] will return each instance of “salmon” and each instance of “farm” as well as potentially including results for “farms”, “farmed” and “farming”.
- A keyword search with quotation marks will only return instances of that exact phrase used. So, for example, a search for “salmon farm” in quotation marks will only return instances of that exact phrase.
Combining search filters
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
More complex keyword searches
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
- a search for “salmon farm” AND “Loch Lomond” will return only results which include both exact phrases
- a search for “salmon farm” NOT “Loch Lomond” will return results for “salmon farm” but exclude results which also include “Loch Lomond”
- a search for “salmon farm” OR “Loch Lomond” will return all results for “salmon farm” and all results for “Loch Lomond” regardless of whether they appear together
Searching by date
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
- Current session (all Official Reports since the current sessions started)
- Last 6 months
- Last 12 months
- each of the previous sessions of Parliament. (Selecting the information icon above the “Select a time period” menu will give you the exact dates for each session.)
- All sessions
- You can also choose to select a custom date range, although adding a Start or End date will mean the search automatically defaults to this option.
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Criathragan Hide all filters
Displaying 862 contributions
|
Public Audit Committee
Major Information and Communications Technology Projects (Accountability and Governance)
Meeting date: 31 March 2022
Craig Hoy
I presume that that talks to the point that the control mechanisms in Government maybe still need to be tightened up.
Public Audit Committee
Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of Scottish Canals”
Meeting date: 24 March 2022
Craig Hoy
The Auditor General’s report explains that, in 2012, the network was transferred to Scottish Canals as a
“heritage asset, with no value attributed to it in the financial statements.”
It goes on to state that
“the canal network has never been valued in its entirety or disclosed in Scottish Canals’ financial statements since”
that transfer took place. Why has no value ever been attributed to the canal network? Did someone drop the ball at the beginning of the process?
Public Audit Committee
Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of Scottish Canals”
Meeting date: 24 March 2022
Craig Hoy
It is obviously quite a technical accounting issue. For people watching the committee, could you explain the impact of the present situation on the day-to-day operation of the organisation and on the integrity of the financial statements?
Public Audit Committee
Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of the Scottish Environment Protection Agency”
Meeting date: 17 March 2022
Craig Hoy
Obviously, the impact of the cyberattack is significant, and it will be felt throughout the organisation. I have questions about staff training and future workforce planning.
You all seem to be in quite good spirits this morning, but you might want to say a little about the impact of the attack on staff morale and how that has been managed since December 2020.
Public Audit Committee
Section 23 Report: “NHS in Scotland 2021”
Meeting date: 17 March 2022
Craig Hoy
A stark statement in the report, at paragraph 45, is:
“The scale of delayed diagnosis and treatment and what this means for NHS services and patients is not yet known.”
To make progress on that, you recommend that
“a cohesive strategy is needed to better understand ... the wider health impact of Covid-19 ... on NHS services and inform future service provision.”
Do you know whether the Scottish Government has any plans to develop such a strategy?
Public Audit Committee
Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of the Scottish Environment Protection Agency”
Meeting date: 17 March 2022
Craig Hoy
That is reassuring—thank you.
Public Audit Committee
Section 23 Report: “NHS in Scotland 2021”
Meeting date: 17 March 2022
Craig Hoy
Do you have any way of assessing or measuring how many patients might have chosen to self-fund their treatment in the independent sector during the pandemic? I asked NHS Lothian that question last week. Is there any way of capturing that detail, other than by looking at what happens when a patient’s appointment comes up or seeing whether they have elected to drop off the waiting list?
Public Audit Committee
Section 23 Report: “NHS in Scotland 2021”
Meeting date: 17 March 2022
Craig Hoy
The issue of general practitioner appointments—face-to-face appointments and appointments through NHS Near Me—has featured significantly in the news. The report highlights that data is not yet available on the number of GP appointments that have been carried out. That means that it is difficult to determine the true number of people who have avoided seeing their GP during the pandemic and who might therefore, in effect, be storing up health problems that could become more extreme later. Do you know why that data is not available? Should the Scottish Government be doing more to gather and disseminate it?
Public Audit Committee
Section 23 Report: “NHS in Scotland 2021”
Meeting date: 17 March 2022
Craig Hoy
Good morning, Mr Boyle. As we know, the diagnosis and treatment backlog has got significantly worse because of Covid, but, in many respects, Covid is not its principal cause. Although NHS boards around Scotland are trying to tackle the backlog, it is, as you say in the report, still significant. Are you aware of any health boards in Scotland that are making good progress in that area? Conversely, are there any boards that you are concerned about with regard to the pace of tackling the backlog?
Public Audit Committee
Section 23 Report: “NHS in Scotland 2021”
Meeting date: 17 March 2022
Craig Hoy
Ms Johnston, as you said, the report includes a recommendation to publish data on waiting times based on the categories in the clinical prioritisation framework, and that is being progressed by Public Health Scotland and NHS boards. What role is the Scottish Government playing in implementing that recommendation? If the information has not yet been published, what more should be done to get that data out there?
