The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 982 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Craig Hoy
In respect of the £36 million that have been misclaimed or obtained through fraud, which you said it would be inhumane to draw back from people, will you get tough on those who misclaim benefits and, when there is an overpayment, will you be robust enough to reclaim that money?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Craig Hoy
No, but the words were put in the public domain.
Finally, I move to two potential risks. The first relates to public sector pay. You set a policy of a 9 per cent increase, but all the public sector pay agreements that have been made so far are projected to be ahead of that. Are you now in the territory of saying to public sector workers who have had pay deals that they should expect nominal pay settlements of about 1 per cent in the third year? In effect, that is where things will end up, unless you are willing to bust your pay policy.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Craig Hoy
On 7 August, the response to a freedom of information request said that 24 bodies submitted applications and there were 40 applications in total. Among the 24 bodies were different Scottish Government directorates, health boards and local authorities. What does it say about the appetite for public sector reform that 24 of 140 to 200 bodies made a submission to that ambitious and wide-ranging scheme?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Craig Hoy
Clearly, some bodies are doing that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Craig Hoy
This is my very final question, convener.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Craig Hoy
It was a two-part question, and the second part is coming. On the 0.5 per cent workforce reduction target, Professor Graeme Roy told us that he was concerned that, if you rely too much on natural attrition, you will end up not having the right people in the right place. How do you avoid that becoming an issue?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 September 2025
Craig Hoy
I will take Andy Witty back to labour market participation. In your response to our question 6, you say:
“Barriers to work in Scotland are well understood and preventative spend, particularly investment in childcare, would bring about more labour market participation.”
With the significant investment in the 1,140 hours of free childcare programme, have you seen any demonstrable shift towards an increase in labour market participation among the target group that would give you confidence to say that further investment would yield a benefit?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 September 2025
Craig Hoy
Would you say that your Government is better at getting people on to benefits than it is at getting people off them?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 September 2025
Craig Hoy
I think that colleagues might want you to do so.
In relation to the work to lift children out of poverty, the Scottish child payment has been welcomed by a number of third sector groups and independent analysts, but I want to talk about those above the poverty line who are in receipt of the payment. You will be aware that, last July, SPICe prepared a paper that contained a graph that showed that more Scottish child payment recipients are above the poverty line than are below it. Do you not think that, if the Scottish child payment was better targeted, you could be more effective in lifting children above the poverty line, rather than measuring its performance against recipients’ average disposable incomes after housing costs?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 September 2025
Craig Hoy
Elaine Morrison, we touched on this issue earlier, but a lot of SMEs and a lot of sectors, such as life sciences, report that raising capital and funds in Scotland is difficult. In the Scottish public sector—in local government, for example—£65 billion is sitting in pension funds. Some of that ends up being invested in the life sciences industry in Australia, for example, through traditional pension investment portfolios, but there seems to be reluctance among public sector pension funds to put money into early-stage investments in, for example, life sciences here in Scotland, although there have been examples of that. For example, the Strathclyde pension fund used a specialist venture capital fund to invest, resulting in a win-win situation of attracting jobs to Strathclyde and a getting a return on its investment. What more could be done, for public infrastructure but also for those sectors that are seeking access to cash in Scotland, to lean on public sector pensions more, and what discussions have you had with Governments or pension funds to bring that culture about?