The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 862 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Craig Hoy
You referred to Wales. In its submission, COSLA says that the equivalent legislation in Wales did not progress due to a lack of funds being available. What is the status of that similar legislation in Wales? Is it likely to come back again? Can any lessons be learned for this bill from the Welsh experience?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Craig Hoy
You have brought me to my final question, which is on children’s mental health. We are aware that there is a real issue with that at the moment. Is it at all possible to quantify what savings you think might be made elsewhere if this kind of programme is embedded at the heart of our school system?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Craig Hoy
Good morning, minister. Thank you for joining us. I do not want to reheat old coal for the sake of it, but I want to go back to the issue of the additional consequentials being factored in. You said:
“These amounts are broadly in line with our internal planning assumption and is factored into spending plans.”
Could you provide the committee with the breakdown of that internal planning and, specifically, where you had factored into those spending plans either the reversal of cuts that you had planned or any additional expenditure that would flow from the consequentials?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Craig Hoy
We discussed that figure earlier. Would you be able to give the committee a breakdown as to how you have arrived at that £300 million number, relatively—
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Craig Hoy
On a technical point, the guide says that the savings in the health and social care portfolio have been retained and are not included as funding reductions in the ABR. What is the reason for retaining those potential savings?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Craig Hoy
That is true, but this is to give the committee some comfort that you are not simply winging it. You were quite specific in your submission, which says that the figure was
“in line with our internal planning assumption and is factored into spending plans.”
Had that money not come forward, would you not have been facing quite a significant increase in the problem that you identified through the ABR?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Craig Hoy
Could there be a structural shortfall this year?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Craig Hoy
Police officers.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Craig Hoy
Can you benchmark in relation to that and look forward to future years?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Craig Hoy
But in October, you were saying that it was around £900 million to £1 billion, and now it is £1.433 billion, which is £400 million more, but in effect, you are saying that there is no—