The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1109 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Craig Hoy
Yes.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Craig Hoy
I want to pick up on the idea of the Scottish Government increasing its borrowing capacity and the risk that could be associated with that.
Additional funds have flowed to the Scottish Government for the removal of the two-child benefit cap, to which it had allocated £155 million. That equates to its having an extra £126 million. When the Scottish Government received that money, it said that it was more than it was expecting, so it would spend the additional money on tackling child poverty, rather than on cutting tax or putting those funds elsewhere.
Given the way in which the Scottish Government approaches public expenditure, is there not a risk that, if its borrowing capacity were to be significantly increased, rather than looking at its budget, it would just use the increased borrowing capacity and, rather than going cold turkey, it would simply continue to spend in the way that it is doing at the moment?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Craig Hoy
Other analysts of productivity have said that it would be heroic for the Government to meet its productivity targets in light of everything in the budget. Based on recent experience, it would be heroic for the Scottish Government to go into a room with trade union officials and come out having negotiated, presumably, a net real-terms reduction in pay. That will not happen.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Craig Hoy
Is there also a risk, given the current structure of the Scottish tax system, that, as public sector workers move into higher rates of tax, the trade unions who are negotiating on their behalf will be tougher, because they know that, in effect, 50 per cent of any pay increase will be handed back to the Scottish and UK exchequer in tax and national insurance?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Craig Hoy
We have also discussed the fact that, by freezing thresholds at the higher level, more and more people are being pulled into tax. That is now happening in the rest of the UK. How does that compare with other nations of our size and net wealth?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Craig Hoy
On that £475 million, the finance secretary said last week that local government was looking at 2 per cent year-on-year increases in real terms. Where would that figure have come from?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Craig Hoy
So while councils say that they will potentially have to increase council tax and the Government says that they will not have to, you are clear in saying that there is a real-terms cut coming to council budgets—up to 2028-29, did you say?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Craig Hoy
Could the Government not simply build in more headroom year on year in the way that it approaches its budget, for example by using the reserve? Would that not be a more prudent way to approach the issue? A moment ago, my colleague said that the UK Government has hardly got a good reputation when it comes to its borrowing levels, either, but the Treasury borrows on behalf of the whole of the UK. In some tough years, some of the real-terms increases in the Scottish budget have emanated from increased borrowing at Treasury level.
12:45
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Craig Hoy
In the same way that you would get a bad credit rating if you were to fully utilise all your credit cards, so, too, would the Scottish Government if it were to fully utilise its borrowing powers or pull the Scottish money down—well, I will not get into the credit rating argument.
I will turn to local government. Last week, the Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Local Government said that, budget to budget, she is delivering a 2 per cent real-terms increase to local government. She described that as
“a settlement that is fair, and which recognises the important role of local government”.
She said that that is “a reasonable deal” given cost of living pressures and urged
“local authorities to translate the settlement into reasonable decisions on council tax.”—[Official Report, 13 January 2026; c 16.]
Having been able to interrogate those numbers further, do you think that that is a reasonable deal for Scottish local government? Should it mitigate above-inflation increases in council tax, if councils are to meet their statutory obligations?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Craig Hoy
One of the dominant themes running through the Scottish budget and the UK budget is the on-going issue of the cost of living. In paragraph 1.9 in the “Economic and fiscal outlook”, you say:
“Growth in real household disposable income per person is projected to fall from 3 per cent in 2024-25 to around ¼ per cent a year over the forecast”.
Given that many households still feel that there is more month than money, is that a reality check to the effect that people are not going to feel better off for the foreseeable future?