The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 862 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Craig Hoy
I got that impression.
In all Governments, including in the UK, I assume that there is merit in having a look at whether the structures are fit for purpose and as efficient and effective as possible. You came into being formally in 2016, which was a time when, politically, there was a sense of what I would call Scottish exceptionalism—other people might come to a different conclusion on that. Given the interdependence of and interconnectivity between the Scottish and the UK public finances, and given that the bodies that we have in the UK are not asymmetrical—that came up when we were in Belfast recently—is there merit in looking again at whether the structure that we have is the most effective and efficient one? Is there a case, for example, for considering somehow making the SFC part of the OBR, as its Scottish division? Would that not also perhaps have the merit of making you slightly more distant from the Scottish Government, which would address any underlying concerns about your independence from Government?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Craig Hoy
Fine.
On the broader role and remit of the organisation, the OECD points to there potentially being an issue in relation to your independence and funding. Can anything be done that could give you greater clarity that this Government or a future one might not use funding as a means by which to somehow neuter your activities?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Craig Hoy
You think that progress is being made and that there is greater awareness in the Government that the process is not helpful.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Craig Hoy
We could call that permanent chaos, but it helps us to identify something that the convener alluded to. Broadening and deepening your spending analysis beyond social security and giving you a greater remit to plan for scenarios might be more important in an environment such as that in Scotland, where we have those political cycles, because bodies such as the SFC provide solid, politically neutral analysis that allows Governments of all political persuasions to make informed choices.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Craig Hoy
Mr Marks, had you been asked or consulted by the former First Minister, Nicola Sturgeon, about whether she should have retained or deleted her WhatsApp messages, what advice would you have given her?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Craig Hoy
Fine. To switch over to public service reform, you told the Public Audit Committee that £280 million is projected to have been saved in the two financial years up to 31 March. That is £280 million of a £115 billion budget over two years, which amounts to a quarter of a per cent in savings. Is that ambitious enough?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Craig Hoy
I have one final question, which is more relevant today than it would otherwise have been. You said to the Public Audit Committee that the difference paid from the block grant in relation to welfare spending, which, if the UK Government goes in a slightly different direction in relation to how people qualify for welfare, will be £1.5 billion or thereabouts, is “material but ... manageable.” Personally, I think that it is material but possibly unmanageable at present. Is there not a significant risk in the Scottish Government’s budget, because of where we are at present and where we might end up if the UK Government cuts back on welfare spending?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Craig Hoy
Okay. Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Craig Hoy
But it is still a drop in the ocean. You also said in the submission that the target is to save £300 million over the next two years.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Craig Hoy
Good morning, Mr Marks. On the issue of public sector reform, I have a few brief questions about the integrity, propriety, transparency and impartiality of the civil service. In March 2024, the First Minister announced the review of the Scottish Government’s use of mobile messaging and other non-corporate devices. In your experience as the permanent secretary, have you seen anything that has given you cause for concern about the culture and the application of communications, particularly digital communications, and the decision-making process of the Government that has flowed from that?