Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 23 January 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 445 contributions

|

Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee

Draft Joint Fisheries Statement

Meeting date: 23 March 2022

Mercedes Villalba

Given that regional inshore fisheries groups are not formally constituted or legally accountable, and that they do not provide an opportunity for public or environmental representation, how will the Government ensure transparency and accountability of any fisheries management plans that the groups develop?

Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee

Draft Joint Fisheries Statement

Meeting date: 23 March 2022

Mercedes Villalba

I understand that the economic link that was announced in November last year requires only 50 per cent of catches that are made by Scottish boats to be landed in the UK, and that that is less than the requirement for their English counterparts. Do you intend to match the English rules, or will the requirement for Scottish boats remain lower than that for English boats?

Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee

Draft Joint Fisheries Statement

Meeting date: 23 March 2022

Mercedes Villalba

To clarify, in relation to how the Government will achieve the bycatch objective, do we need to wait until the consultation on the future catching policy has concluded?

Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee

Draft Joint Fisheries Statement

Meeting date: 23 March 2022

Mercedes Villalba

The 2020 act states that the Administrations must meet the bycatch objective, part of which requires that

“the catching of fish that are below minimum conservation reference size, and other bycatch, is avoided or reduced.”

The joint fisheries statement does not seem to include any plans for how that will be done. The future catching policy, which was published last week, states that, in the case of undersized fish, “we propose allowing discarding”. Could you explain how those two positions are consistent with each other?

Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee

Draft Joint Fisheries Statement

Meeting date: 23 March 2022

Mercedes Villalba

Do you think that the principle of transparency and accountability is important in relation to those plans?

Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee

Draft Joint Fisheries Statement

Meeting date: 23 March 2022

Mercedes Villalba

Do you expect the requirement for Scottish boats to match that for English boats?

Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee

Draft Joint Fisheries Statement

Meeting date: 23 March 2022

Mercedes Villalba

While we are on the subject of fisheries objectives, I wonder whether we could hear from Elspeth Macdonald and Elaine Whyte on whether their organisations have proposed any specific plans or policies that are needed to meet the climate change objective.

Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 16 March 2022

Mercedes Villalba

You might be getting some feedback—I can hear a bit of an echo.

I want to comment on the type of fishing that is being restricted. I understand that, when the Government announced its public consultation on the proposals, it confirmed that hand diving for scallops will no longer be prohibited but that creeling will still be prohibited, along with dredging and trawling. Could we seek some clarification from the minister about why those different types of fishing—creeling, dredging and trawling—are being treated in the same way despite the fact that the Scottish Government categorises dredging as severe, whereas creeling is considered low impact?

The Government previously said that it wants to take a precautionary approach, but, because it chose the smaller of two possible boundary areas, I am confused about whether the approach is precautionary. It seems that, within the new, smaller boundary, everything will be prohibited and that, outside the boundary, everything will be allowed. There are different types of fishing, with different impact levels, so I would be grateful if we could seek some clarity from the minister about why those activities have been categorised in the same way.

Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 9 March 2022

Mercedes Villalba

Thank you.

Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 9 March 2022

Mercedes Villalba

Good morning, cabinet secretary. I apologise for the fact that I cannot be there in person. I have a couple of questions on the scientific evidence. I will try to keep my questions short, and I would be grateful for succinct answers.

The Scottish Government’s consultation on the spawning closure cites a study that was undertaken by the Scottish Oceans Institute and the Clyde Fishermen’s Association. Are you aware of that study?