The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1038 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Tess White
The amendments are about basic transparency and making sure that we understand how the system is working in practice. At stage 1, we heard concerns that, without proper data, it will be difficult to know whether the bill is having unintended effects on children, families or schools, and the amendments address that gap.
Amendment 35 makes a small but important technical change by linking the reporting duty to the new definitions in the bill so that data on withdrawals is recorded consistently and clearly. That would help to ensure that information is accurate and comparable across schools and local authorities.
Amendment 39 would introduce a clear reporting requirement by requiring schools to report annually on requests for withdrawal from religious instruction and religious observance. It also requires reporting on how often pupils objected to a parental request and how often those objections were upheld. The amendment does not ask schools to record beliefs or motivations. It simply collects information on how the process is being used and where the disagreements are arising.
I move amendment 35.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Tess White
Cabinet secretary, I hope that you will be pleased to hear that, based on what you have just said—that you will take the amendments away, consider them, review them and then come back—I will not press my amendment. Thank you for that, and I look forward to working with you on that.
Amendment 35, by agreement, withdrawn.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Tess White
Cabinet secretary, convener and committee, these amendments are about making sure that we properly understand the impact of the bill before it comes into force, rather than dealing with problems after the fact. My colleague Paul O’Kane has referred to the fact that we have just over three months until the end of the parliamentary session and it feels that the bill is being rushed through, but it is not a simple bill.
At stage 1, we heard concerns about workload, resources and the effect on relationships between schools, parents and pupils. The amendments would ensure that those concerns are properly considered in advance. I have raised the point that only three educational authorities were consulted—I stress that, because it shocked me.
Amendment 55 would require the Scottish ministers to carry out and publish a pre-commencement impact assessment on the likely effects of the bill. That assessment would have to look specifically at the impact on families, parents, children, teaching staff and support staff. That matters, because the bill introduces new duties and new processes for schools, and those changes will affect real people in real settings.
Amendment 56 would make sure that the impact assessment is considered by a parliamentary committee with responsibility for education before the act is commenced. That would give Parliament an opportunity to scrutinise the findings and ensure that any risks or pressures have been properly thought through.
I move amendment 55.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Tess White
Thank you, convener, and thanks to the committee for its work on this petition. We welcome the commitment from Jo Farrell and Police Scotland, and it is also good to hear that a key loose end will now be closed and that the committee will be writing to the courts.
I want to say two things, if I may. First, will the letter to the courts be sent before the end of the year, convener? Secondly, I note that, for completeness, Murray Blackburn Mackenzie has formally asked the committee to obtain the same assurance from the Scottish Prison Service.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Tess White
I was brief before, convener, and I would just like to say thank you now.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Tess White
Thank you. If you could come back with that information, that would be appreciated.
I will move on to my second question. We heard about the isolation that some deaf pupils feel when they are in mainstream schools. How might support for deaf pupils in mainstream schools be improved?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Tess White
Good morning, Deputy First Minister and officials. My question is about education. Thank you for saying in your address that, as part of the planning, you are costing a national tutor course and will support BSL users to become teachers. Do you have any other thoughts on how to increase the number of deaf BSL users who are qualified to teach BSL-using pupils?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Tess White
Thank you. I have a follow-up question. You cannot manage what you do not measure, so do you have a starting position for the number of trained teachers who are deaf BSL users? Do you have a figure for 10 years ago, for five years ago, for now and for the future?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Tess White
But it is in there somewhere.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Tess White
That goes back to my point that you cannot manage what you do not measure, so having it as part of your mainstreaming work is important.
I have one final question, Deputy First Minister. Do you or your officials have any thoughts on the idea of piloting BSL learning opportunities for all pupils in Scotland?