The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 854 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Tess White
That is alarming.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Tess White
I have just one key question, which is for Mark Hazelwood. The SPPC has said that the bill’s principles do not take into account people who still need care but who have no hope or expectation of a cure. If the issue is not addressed, what consequences will that, in your opinion, have for those patients?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Tess White
I have a question for Dr Manji and Cathie Russell. Is there a lack of ambition in the implementation of Anne’s law? Are you satisfied with the pace of change?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2022
Tess White
My question is for Andy Miller. The SCLD has said that some areas of the bill
“are within the scope for co-design, while other areas are not.”
What areas do you feel are not subject to co-design?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2022
Tess White
It may have been my interpretation, so that is really helpful; thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2022
Tess White
No.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2022
Tess White
I have one question for Fanchea Kelly and Margaret McCarthy. The Scottish Care chief executive, Donald Macaskill, has estimated that 30 to 40 per cent of the country’s residential adult care facilities might close permanently because of the immediate challenges that they face. In your opinion, would the projected £1.3 billion that is earmarked for the national care service be better invested in the local delivery of social care now?
11:00Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2022
Tess White
My question is for Sandra MacLeod. In your written submission, you emphasised that
“It is essential that the scrutiny of legislation by Parliament and stakeholders is not diluted by using secondary legislation over primary legislation.”
What would you prefer to see in the bill at this stage? What do you understand as co-design with respect to the bill?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Tess White
I am sorry that I was late this morning—I was at another committee meeting.
I have a question for Rosemary Agnew and Kevin Mitchell. Many are concerned that the bill gives too much centralised power to ministers, and we have heard today that it will make the ombudsman function toothless and powerless and that, as Rosemary said, it will make the SPSO unable to do its job. What other conflicts of interest do you foresee?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Tess White
I have two amendments in the group. The main one is amendment 135, which seeks to place a duty on the Scottish ministers to encourage public understanding of not just the act’s provisions but its effects more widely. Amendment 142 requires that the Scottish ministers must prepare and publish a report on how that requirement has been fulfilled,
“no later than 6 months after the day after Royal Assent.”
On amendment 142, during stage 1, we heard evidence that raised question marks over what it means to live in an acquired gender; whether name changes will be required; what it means to make a false declaration; whether GRCs will be recognised by other jurisdictions in the United Kingdom and elsewhere; whether there is a pathway to detransition in the bill; what the bill means for the operation of the Equality Act 2010; and what the bill’s implications will be for single-sex spaces and women and girls. That is just the tip of the iceberg. The number of amendments that have been lodged at stage 2 is indicative of just how little clarity the bill provides on key provisions. One stakeholder described the Scottish Government’s own understanding of the bill as “flawed”.
Of course we seek to improve the bill’s clarity at stage 2, but it remains the case that the public need to understand what the bill will do and will not do once it has been passed; how it will affect people, especially women and girls; how people can use the bill; and what the penalties will be for misuse.