The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 771 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2023
Tess White
I have one question, but first I want to follow up on what Baz Moffat just said. I am going through the coaching qualification and I can see that I will have to do child protection, anti-doping and first aid as mandatory modules. Are you suggesting that in addition to those three, there could be a fourth module on women and girls?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2023
Tess White
Thank you for that answer.
On a separate topic, we went out to talk to women and girls who do sports, and one issue that they raised was the colour of their sports kits. We know that sport is good for physical health, but they talked about mental health and the huge anxiety that they feel when their periods are coming—not just when they are on their period, but those times when they do not know when it will come. That stops girls doing sport. However, some organisations do not see it as an issue and it is not spoken about. What further steps could be taken to minimise the impact of periods on participation in sport and physical activity?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2023
Tess White
I have a question for Heidi Vistisen. Women in Sport has highlighted that adult males have 40 to 50 per cent more upper body strength, 20 to 40 per cent more lower limb strength and 12kg more skeletal muscle mass than women. All of that has implications for trans inclusion in women’s sport, as sports councils and governing bodies are finding. How would you strike a balance between inclusion, fairness and safety in women’s sport?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2023
Tess White
Great; thank you. If I may, can I bring in Gordon Jamieson, or should we move on?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2023
Tess White
Gordon Jamieson, will you give your view on that topic, please?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2023
Tess White
Thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2023
Tess White
You have not answered my question, Heidi. My question was about how you would strike a balance between inclusion, fairness and safety in women’s sport.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2023
Tess White
I have two questions on consultants and a supplementary. My first question is for Michael Dickson.
At the end of last year, NHS Shetland had a vacancy rate of 39 per cent for medical and dental consultants, which is against a backdrop of 6.5 per cent for the whole of Scotland. In your submission, you stated that it is
“difficult to recruit consultants with the breadth of skills needed”
for a remote and rural location
“because the NHS no longer trains staff in that way.”
Can you say a bit more about that and can you give your view on how to overcome it?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Tess White
[Inaudible.]—health boards to manage women with mesh complications?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Tess White
I appreciate the acceptance that an 82-week wait is not acceptable, but what guidance is being given to health boards to manage women with mesh complications?