The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 787 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 17 April 2024
Tess White
Thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Tess White
Earlier, you said that the MUP will impact all drinkers. However, it will hit social drinkers, in particular, in their shopping basket. Rather than the MUP targeting harmful drinking, it will hit everybody in the social drinker group.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Tess White
Do you recognise that there are massively differing opinions on the issue? Many people think that, rather than being a silver bullet, MUP is a blunt instrument with massive holes in it.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Tess White
You are confirming that that was modelling, not statistics.
I will go back to the uprating question. Minister, you talked about whether we might use RPI or CPI in the future. Do you intend to come back to Parliament when there is a review so that there can be a robust analysis that is based on facts, not modelling?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Tess White
Let me check that, minister. You are open-minded about coming back to the committee, hopefully when you have some facts rather than models, which would be a good opportunity to come and have another review and to discuss and debate the policy.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Tess White
The Public Health Scotland evaluation of MUP is riddled with holes, as are the Scottish Government’s conclusions about its effectiveness. That is not my view; the Law Society of Scotland said:
“In our view, the study does not provide enough evidence that the introduction of MUP ‘saved lives’”,
and other stakeholders in the Scottish Government’s consultation described the evaluation as
“selective, biased, misleading or flawed”.
In your opinion, and ahead of the expiry of the sunset clause, how does that square with the robust evaluation that former health secretary Nicola Sturgeon promised during the parliamentary passage of the bill in 2012?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Tess White
Minister, I have a question about uprating, but I would like to go back to harmful drinking. If you remember, the bill’s financial memorandum emphasised that minimum pricing would
“reduce the consumption of alcohol by harmful drinkers”.
However, if we look at the facts, we see a 25 per cent increase in the number of alcohol-related deaths over the past three years alone and, over the past 10 years, the number of people accessing alcohol treatment services has gone down by 40 per cent. Do you agree that harmful and hazardous drinkers are the ones who need the greatest help?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Tess White
We will talk later about uprating. Public Health Scotland agrees that the data was based on modelling, rather than actual statistics.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Tess White
MUP is a blunt instrument to tackle a very complex problem, and the Public Health Scotland evaluation is riddled with holes. Alcohol-specific deaths are at their highest since 2008. Moderate drinkers are being penalised and will be penalised even more by the price increase. Other approaches in treatment of alcohol addiction are underfunded and underresourced.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
Tess White
I am interested to hear your view on balance and proportionality. On one hand, there is the right of women to access healthcare and not be intimidated and harassed. On the other hand, we heard last week from faith groups that are very passionate about their right to pray. We also heard from a woman who had basically changed her mind at the last minute because of that influence.
Therefore, given that there are chapels or places of worship at hospital sites, if faith groups need to pray—the point was made about praying at sites—would it be reasonable to say that they can go to the chapel or place of worship to pray, rather than their feeling the need to intimidate or harass someone, or do whatever is defined as “silent prayer”, which many women see as harassment and intimidation? I am talking about balancing the needs of women to access healthcare without fear of intimidation and the rights of faith groups to pray at the site where they feel that they need to pray.