The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1038 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Tess White
But you oversee it.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Tess White
That is fine. We will give you a copy of the Sunday Post. Thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Tess White
During the debate on the issue in the chamber, there was huge criticism of the way in which the Scottish Legal Aid Board operates and its poor consultation. Has that been heard as well?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Tess White
Thank you.
11:45
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Tess White
I hear you. Are you doing your own safeguarding and due diligence checks on organisations to which you give funding?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Tess White
I am talking about your accountability, minister, and the cabinet secretary’s accountability. You cannot delegate accountability for health and safety. Are you satisfied that every pound of Government money—of the taxpayer’s money—that you are spending is being spent wisely and properly? Have you done your own safeguarding checks?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Tess White
Thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Tess White
No. I have taken up enough time on this. We will send you the Sunday Post article and I will write to you separately. I ask you, pending a review and an investigation, if you would consider withdrawing funding. I will leave that question with you and I will pass back to the convener now.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Tess White
Good morning. I will start with the cabinet secretary, then go to the minister and then go back to the cabinet secretary.
Cabinet secretary, what impact has the new strategic integrated impact assessments approach had on the budget process?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Tess White
That is true. However, let us look at the outcomes in relation to violence against women and girls. This committee has had debates on that in the Parliament fairly recently, and we looked at evidence that was compiled by the Women’s Rights Network on sexual assaults in hospitals and the lack of single-sex wards, lengthy waits for rape support services, and the wider deterioration of women’s safety and rights. It is misleading to say in row 31 of the spreadsheet, on the budget line on violence against women and girls—a topic we have had huge debates and several committee sessions on—that it is all exceptional, exceptional, exceptional. Cabinet secretary, I put it to you that you might want to revisit that when you are looking at the outcomes.
I will go back to what you and the minister said at the start about a “safe, prosperous and green society” and the duty to “protect the most vulnerable”. On protections for the most vulnerable, many organisations out there would not score you as exceptional.