The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1719 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 6 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
So, it comes back to the decision-making power.
I am interested in exploring questions of accountability as well. Local authority folk might want to come in on this, but I will direct the question to Alasdair Ross and Alison Stuart.
How would you like questions around community empowerment and the accountability for decisions to be determined? At whatever level decisions are made—whether local government, the Scottish Government or community councils—how would you like accountability to be embedded in our understanding of the decision-making processes?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 6 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
May I have one more question on planning?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 6 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
That makes sense.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Maggie Chapman
Good morning to the three of you. Thank you for joining us today. I want to drill down into some of the legal complexities and their impacts, primarily, for local government—Tony Buchanan—and for Police Scotland, Derek Frew. In your opening statement, Tony, you talked about the close partnership working that you have had, which you hope will continue, in working out some of the concerns around identifying for you, for the public and for everybody which functions are in and which are out.
This question perhaps echoes some of the points that we heard earlier. We know that the legal redress side of things is only one component of the legislation. There is a whole host of other bits in the UNCRC, and in other legislation, that are about rights protections for children and young people. Given that duty bearers are encouraged and asked to act in compliance anyway, can you unpick a little bit more the exact complexities and tensions that you have identified and whether there are things that we can consider, given the overall point that we should be complying anyway?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Maggie Chapman
Okay. I will leave it there for now, convener.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, panel. Thank you for being here and for your written contributions and your contributions today. I want to pick up on a couple of the legal complexity issues that Paul O’Kane and Meghan Gallacher have highlighted.
Juliet, you said that children and young people do not need to know which laws are being breached where things are going wrong, but that they need to know what their rights are. Because of the partial coverage that we will have with the proposed amendments, there will be gaps. Are you or any of your members concerned that those gaps will lead to a mismatch of expectation and reality with regard to how we tackle issues when there is a breach and something goes wrong?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Maggie Chapman
My next question is for Jan Savage and Nicola Killean. I ask Jan to comment first. As commissioners, you will be given additional responsibilities and powers through the bill. This issue will be important as we look ahead to the human rights legislation, too. How will the amended bill affect your current work? What additional resources, expertise and skills will you and your organisations need to make sure that, when you are required to take legal action, you can do so in a meaningful way?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Maggie Chapman
Fiona, do you want to comment, given the statutory obligations that the Law Society has? Do you see any need for thinking differently in your work?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Maggie Chapman
That is helpful; thank you.
Andrew Tickell, my last question is for you. I would like to hear your thoughts on how to ensure that we offer guidance and support to duty bearers and other service providers without that leading to a focus on the litigation elements, for organisational protection or for a range of other reasons that we have already discussed. What are your thoughts and comments on how we can best avoid that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Maggie Chapman
It is helpful. You make a clear ask for clear and detailed guidance. Given the conversations that have happened to date, do you have concerns at the moment that that guidance will be fuzzy or absent? Are there things that you would like us, as the scrutinising committee, to make very clear recommendations about? It is all very well to say that we want clear guidance, but it is important to understand what we mean by clear guidance.