The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1498 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2023
Maggie Chapman
Okay, thank you; that is helpful. Jen Ang, you commented on the kind of standardisation that would be needed and the inclusion of a right to legal representation, along the lines that Colin Lancaster has described. What would that process require, and what would need to change around our current thinking about legal aid?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2023
Maggie Chapman
Thank you—that was really helpful. It is a big question for us to consider, but it is really important.
Finally, I was struck by Rachel Moon’s comment in her opening remarks that, in relation to the strategic work that needs to be done on legal aid, we needed to
“move the boundaries of equalities law.”
I am curious to hear a little bit more about what you mean by that.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2023
Maggie Chapman
That was interesting, and in some ways, it ties in with Fiona McPhail’s previous point about looking at rights in the round and ensuring that we are linking into the issue of what all citizens should be able to expect of services, whether they be legal or other public services.
I could go on, but I probably should not. Thank you, convener.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2023
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us and for what you have said.
We have already touched on some of the legal aid reforms that you consider to be required, but I want to explore some of them in a bit more detail.
We have talked about the need for different funding and delivery models. Jim Stephenson mentioned the need for an independent body to oversee some of that. I am also struck by the fact that the Evans review of 2018 is five years old now, and Jim Stephenson said that there had been very little movement since then. The review was not persuaded of a general need to increase legal aid fees. Is that because there is a distinction between civil cases and criminal cases? Does the civil stuff get left out a little bit in a way that the criminal stuff does not? What is your assessment of where the review’s position on that came from?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2023
Maggie Chapman
Should we consider legal aid to be a public service? Do you think that it would help if we had that as the framework within which we worked? That would bring together all the different elements that you have just mentioned in a more coherent way. Would that help?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2023
Maggie Chapman
I have a question for Colin Lancaster on the connection between the delivery models and funding. Where do you see us needing to go with that? In your opening remarks, you mentioned the need for primary legislation. Will you unpick that a little bit more?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2023
Maggie Chapman
Another striking idea to come from the Evans review was the need to shift to a more citizen-centred system. What would we need to do with our funding models and the funding landscape to achieve that approach?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2023
Maggie Chapman
That goes back to Fiona McPhail’s question—what if you had the right to legal representation if you were about to lose your house? Is that the kind of thing that we could draw into that model of understanding?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2023
Maggie Chapman
Thank you, Jen; that is helpful. Fiona, I have referenced you a few times. Do you want to come in? I will then have one final question.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2023
Maggie Chapman
That would be better for everybody.