The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1719 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
I have some questions on how the court was supported to carry out its scrutiny role. I will start with Amanda Millar. What training and support were provided to court members so that lay members—people without the expertise or professional training that others on court would be expected to have—could understand the information, the financial reports and the other types of reports? At that level of governance of a large and complex organisation, there will be things that not everybody can understand. What support and training were court members given, either during induction or on an on-going basis?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
As somebody who sat on a university court for more than six years, I am aware of the different expertise and opportunities that the range of membership brings. Were you aware of any gaps in understanding, knowledge, skills or expertise? If so, did you do anything to try to remedy that situation?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
A couple of times this morning, you have said that the university did not have sufficient cash to maintain its assets. Surely, a risk alarm bell must have gone off because of that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
And the forecasts and modelling that you had done.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
Some of the decisions on recruitment, restructuring, industrial relations and that kind of thing had very clear detrimental consequences for predominantly lower paid members of staff who are women. Why did the EQIAs not pick that up, and why was action not taken as a result?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
There were various situations in which leadership, management or strategy decisions were not made by the university executive group but outsourced to consultancy companies and other organisations, because of existing relationships that they might or might not have had with the university.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
I might come back to that.
Perhaps this will be a more productive line of questioning. Earlier, there were discussions about the relative growth of certain parts of the university while other parts were struggling. We have heard quite clearly that the finance team were underresourced and struggling to cope with their stretched workload, but, at the same time, the executive and strategy office was ballooning. Given your provision of leadership of strategic development and effective and efficient management, was there ever a point at which you challenged why so many jobs were being created in some parts of the university while other areas were really struggling and being targeted for cuts?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
Who should take responsibility for the failure of the Blueprints admissions software?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
Given that there was a clear breach of the regulations, it might be useful for the committee to have that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
Almost 700 members of staff faced compulsory redundancy earlier this year, and that is still on the table. It is they who will pay the price for your and others’ failure. Is that right? Is that justice?