The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1719 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
So there is not a direct link with workforce planning beyond the shift to an import hub.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
Good morning and thank you for joining us this morning. I want to continue the line of questioning on jobs, workforce planning and what you anticipate happening, not just over the 18 months but beyond that. You have talked about the reduction in jobs that is likely to happen as the site shifts from refinery to import hub. I am interested in the relationship between that and the biorefinery for the future, which you have spoken about. An estimated 50,000 jobs would be generated under the plans for the green freeport. If there is to be a reduction to roughly 100 jobs with the import hub—and you mentioned a need for 50 jobs to decommission existing infrastructure—how would that play into the broader, astonishing, increase in job numbers for the site, or for the area, in relation to the freeport?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
What skills and retraining are required for the jobs that you anticipate will continue to exist at the import hub? What professional changes will be required for the employees that you currently have? How will you support them through that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
In another line of questioning, Colin Beattie asked about the supply chain and indirect jobs. Do you see a role for your business in supporting any reskilling, upskilling or retraining for supply chain contractors and others, or is that their business?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
Okay. I might have a couple of other questions later.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
What about light and noise pollution?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
Are you not routinely monitoring either of those?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
However, you still have a responsibility, I think, to monitor and assess those impacts, and I am not hearing that you are doing that. With regard to noise in particular, you can do things including management of different flight paths, which I have not heard you talk about.
I will move on to sustainable aviation fuel. Earlier this year, the Royal Society published a report that considered a suite of four options that looked as if they might present possibilities for sustainable aviation fuel development. It concluded that none of the four options looks as if it will replace fossil jet fuel in the near future.
Can you outline how quantified your target is to replace one of your seven fuel tanks with SAF? What is the timescale for that? How robust is that? Is it just wishful thinking? Is it the case that you want to do it, but the technology does not exist yet?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
I did not hear an answer to the question about how confident you are that it could happen. The Royal Society is quite clear that, in the short term, none of the options that are currently being explored looks likely to replace fossil jet fuel in the short term. I am considering longer-term risk. You said that you will do it, but I have not heard a timescale, so if and when it does not happen, what will happen to your overall assessment?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
I understand what you say about the expectations that you would have of any business or any airport, regardless of ownership structure or model, but there is a question for me, given what the airport’s annual report indicates as a success. It is on track to reach 50 per cent carbon emission reduction in its operations by 2030. There is also the vague but current thinking on opportunities around sustainable aviation fuel and other things. In terms of not only the airport’s carbon emission reduction but its shift into the broader net zero space for Scotland’s industry and energy accounting, are there conditions that, as the owner, the Scottish Government can put on it that could not be done in the private sector? The airport has been in public ownership for 10 years, so I was quite surprised to learn that there is no social responsibility investment statement or a clear environmental, social and governance statement. As its public owners, could we be doing better right now, never mind about looking forward and hoping for a different model in the future?