The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1580 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 6 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
Therefore, there is quite a lot of work that we and partners in local government need to do to build trust. I was going to say “rebuild” trust, but that would imply that trust existed to begin with. Are there particular things that we need to focus on as we do that, or does it come back to what you were saying earlier about the fact that we need to invest in people, time and capacity?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 6 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
I just want to come back on what Jim Grant and Stuart Bews, in particular, have said. We have talked about some of the issues that you and community groups have with regard to broader planning strategies, and you have mentioned the planning process, consultations and community engagement in that respect. Is there any more that we can do to reach people who cannot engage—or who might not know how to engage? After all, a consultation is only as good as the framework that sets it up and, indeed, the responses that it gets back. If we are not reaching the right people, we are going to miss folk. Can you comment on that, particularly with regard to the spatial planning aspect?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 6 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
Do you see that linking to other regional strategic work, such as the work that is happening within the regional economic partnerships? Specifically with regard to the just transition fund, have you had those kinds of conversations at the regional economic partnership level?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 6 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
That is helpful. Is that work happening? Are you supporting communities to bring their expertise forward? We are talking about bringing expertise and experience together in different ways. What structures are preventing you from doing that? We have heard about funding, and I know that there will be other questions about funding. What structures are preventing you from doing that in an effective way? If we dealt with those issues, would we be able to get that cross-community collaboration and, rather than genuine consultation, genuine co-production of a long-term strategy for the just transition?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Maggie Chapman
That is helpful; thank you.
Andrew Tickell, my last question is for you. I would like to hear your thoughts on how to ensure that we offer guidance and support to duty bearers and other service providers without that leading to a focus on the litigation elements, for organisational protection or for a range of other reasons that we have already discussed. What are your thoughts and comments on how we can best avoid that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Maggie Chapman
I have a similar question for Derek Frew. On the capacity issues that you highlighted, will you provide some detail on how you envisage dealing with some of those complexities to do with the gaps arising from the mismatch between reality and expectation that your colleagues might face, as well as the people whom you are looking to support?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Maggie Chapman
It is helpful. You make a clear ask for clear and detailed guidance. Given the conversations that have happened to date, do you have concerns at the moment that that guidance will be fuzzy or absent? Are there things that you would like us, as the scrutinising committee, to make very clear recommendations about? It is all very well to say that we want clear guidance, but it is important to understand what we mean by clear guidance.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Maggie Chapman
Thanks, Juliet. That is really clear.
It is clear that this is a journey, as you have said, and that we are not stopping here. Are there approaches or things that you and your members would like to see done either by the Scottish Government or by other duty bearers? I recognise that many of your members are duty bearers, too. Even if things are not completely covered—although we hope that coverage will increase over time—what approaches can we take and what guidance are you looking for to ensure that we have that overview?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Maggie Chapman
I am sure that the conversations about exactly what needs to be in the guidance will carry on. I will leave it there for now.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, panel. Thank you for being here and for your written contributions and your contributions today. I want to pick up on a couple of the legal complexity issues that Paul O’Kane and Meghan Gallacher have highlighted.
Juliet, you said that children and young people do not need to know which laws are being breached where things are going wrong, but that they need to know what their rights are. Because of the partial coverage that we will have with the proposed amendments, there will be gaps. Are you or any of your members concerned that those gaps will lead to a mismatch of expectation and reality with regard to how we tackle issues when there is a breach and something goes wrong?