The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1654 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
Thanks—that is helpful. We heard from the consumer panel of the SLCC that it broadly welcomes the simplification proposals in the bill.
Those are all my questions on that topic, but I have a final general one.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
Okay. However, that split retains some of the complexity of the system, which is one of the challenges that Fulton MacGregor and others have alluded to. There is also an issue with the SLCC’s assertion that it requires additional powers with regard to both entering its information in a timely way and things such as setting minimum standards. There are questions about whether there are sufficient checks and balances to ensure that the SLCC does not abuse those additional powers. Are there sufficient checks and balances or should we be looking at anything else?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
Thanks for your comments so far, minister. I have a couple of questions on the SLCC, on the new body that the bill proposes to establish and on the processes involved.
First, the SLCC considers that, in what is outlined in the bill, the responsibility for dealing with complaints remains split between bodies and that professional bodies might have a conflict of interest. How do you respond to those challenges?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
Okay, thank you. I have another question but it is on a different issue, convener.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, minister. Thank you for joining us. Given what you said about the limited criteria and starting small, with the potential to expand the criteria over time on the basis of lessons learned, I am interested in how we ensure that people who might benefit from the mental health moratorium and people who might give support or advice to debtors on it and on mental health or financial issues will be aware of exactly what the moratorium entails and the criteria. What mechanisms do you have in mind for ensuring awareness among mental health professionals, those in the money advice sector and others who support people with financial or mental health difficulties?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
When you say “awareness across the sector”, do you mean the money advice sector, mental health professionals or both?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
To follow on from that, given the limited eligibility for the mental health moratorium, if people are within the six-month standard moratorium, is there any possibility—under advice or guidance from either mental health professionals or money advisers—of that period being extended if they are still struggling to get to grips with their financial situation because of mental health but do not meet the compulsory treatment order level? Have you given any consideration to that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
On democratic participation, I heard what you said earlier in response to Colin Smyth’s questions about community assemblies and the process for getting the outcomes from or desires of those into policy and implementation. Are there other things that we need to think about to ensure that people’s views, whether they are community members or workers, are translated into action and the transformations that we need? What do we, as policymakers, need to do to enhance trust in the process?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
That is really helpful. The committee has talked quite a lot about jobs, but housing is one of the other anchors of wellbeing and the positive vision that we want to achieve. I will leave it there for now.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
Yes.