The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1654 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
My question follows on from one of Kevin Stewart’s lines of questioning and is about the medium-term strategic outlook for the airport.
The Scottish Government considers the airport to be a strategic infrastructure asset and the decision taken to save jobs 10 years ago is noted, but I have a question about the relationship between the Government’s ownership of the airport and its ability to deliver on strategic priorities such as business diversification, net zero or any of the other issues mentioned by the earlier witnesses. If there was a transfer of ownership, or if the airport was released back to the private sector, there would not necessarily be the same potential to apply conditions or to focus on certain elements of those strategic objectives. Can you say a little about your assessment of the likelihood of Prestwick becoming the kind of airport that you think it ought to be and about how that might be different under private sector, as opposed to Government, ownership?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
I apologise if I have missed this, but I could not find in your annual report any quantifying or monitoring of social return on investment. Will you say a bit more about that? Maybe it is an extension of what you said about jobs and the wider community.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
I am sorry, Ian, but I will stop you there. I asked specifically about non-carbon-related, non-emissions-related environmental impacts.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
Yes—and other pollutants.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
Okay. Therefore, I suppose that the issue is that the checks and balances that you outline—I understand what they are—are retrospective in many ways. I am thinking about what would happen before we got to the point when those measures needed to be invoked. Is there enough certainty that those processes would ensure that the new commission would not—I am not saying abuse the powers—act in a way that was not congruent with the principles of the bill and those powers?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
We have heard from different witnesses during our evidence gathering that some of the reforms in the bill are long overdue. We often focus on the areas of disagreement, as we have done in the past couple of weeks. Given those aspects on which there is clear and high-profile disagreement, what is your assessment of the possibility that we will not get to a point at which we can agree to the principles of the bill? Should that happen, who would win and who would lose, given that some people have been waiting for 16 or 17 years for some of the reforms?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
Thank you. That is helpful.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, minister. Thank you for being here this morning. I have a quick question on issues that could have arisen after the transition period.
Given the commitment to alignment that the Scottish Government has made, are there measures in place that we can take independent of the UK legislature on cost savings beyond transition, or is that it? Essentially, I am asking whether there is a way that we can continue to be aligned with the likes of Iceland, Norway and Switzerland beyond the cut-off period.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
You said that you will lodge amendments at stage 2 to deal with some of the key issues where there is disagreement. It would be unprecedented, I think, to have those amendments any earlier than that, if they were not part of the initial drafting.
I have a general question, which is maybe a little bit cheeky and unfair. If you had known then what you know now and you were designing the bill from scratch, would you have done things a little differently?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
I have another quick follow-up on some of the complexity issues in relation to the commission.
There have been questions from very different stakeholders and very different interests about the complexity that consumers face. Minister, you have talked quite a lot about balance and trying to balance competing views. Have you got the balance right around the different processes and procedures that the faculty, the Law Society and consumers would have to go through in relation to potentially having to jump through different hoops or go to different bodies to pursue complaints? How did you come to the decision that we find in the bill?