The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1719 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
So you would not have perhaps reflected that that might indicate something about the culture of the institution: that, notwithstanding any individual or specific issues, there might be a broader cultural issue.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
So you were not involved in that decision, as far as you can recall.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
The Gillies report clearly states:
“The failure of the University’s financial governance system was self-inflicted and experienced multiple times and at multiple levels.”
Who should pay for that self-inflicted failure?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
That is cold comfort to the nearly 700 people who still have the threat of compulsory redundancy hanging over them. Those 700 people have devoted a lot of their time to the institution, and they live in Dundee or the wider region. It is devastating not just for those individuals but for the city and the wider communities. Should they pay? Is that fair?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
Do you accept, as the leader of the institution, that it is leadership that dictates or directs an institutional culture? It might have had that culture for some time, but you were not there for just a couple of months. There was perhaps time to shift that, yet it appears to have got worse.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
You say that it never happened, but you got involved in 2021-22 when you tried to close the University of Dundee superannuation and life assurance scheme—UODSS. Apparently, you said at a meeting that keeping the scheme open would be an existential threat to the university. Do you recall that? It is clearly an example of you getting involved in industrial relations, although you have just told us that you did not really do that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
If you had become aware of accusations or claims of misogyny and homophobia across the institution, regardless of who was making those accusations or being accused, what would you have done?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
You lost your job with six months’ salary—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
Who should pay for that self-inflicted failure?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
You have talked about trying to foster transparency and openness. Given that there were some very difficult relationships between the management and staff during your time on court, what was your approach to including staff, some of whom had been on strike for 12 weeks? They clearly felt that management was not there to support them and was not supporting them. Did you attempt to bridge the gap in communication and conversation with staff?