The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1498 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Maggie Chapman
That is helpful. In the conversations that you, COSLA and others have had, do you get the sense that there is a shared understanding across different partners of what that guidance needs to say?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Maggie Chapman
Is there a danger that that might undermine the culture of compliance that we want to support and encourage and that we want to see going beyond the letter of the law?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Maggie Chapman
Thank you—that is helpful. I suppose that that links to the point that you made earlier. If we—by “we”, I mean us collectively, not us in Parliament or you separately—do not get the guidance and the resource allocation right, do you think that there is a danger that, because we are worried about litigation, duty bearers might focus exclusively on the legal elements rather than the bits that are not included in incorporation because they involve UK acts rather than Scottish Parliament acts, to the detriment of the excluded areas when it comes to providing the service?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Maggie Chapman
Good morning to the three of you. Thank you for joining us today. I want to drill down into some of the legal complexities and their impacts, primarily, for local government—Tony Buchanan—and for Police Scotland, Derek Frew. In your opening statement, Tony, you talked about the close partnership working that you have had, which you hope will continue, in working out some of the concerns around identifying for you, for the public and for everybody which functions are in and which are out.
This question perhaps echoes some of the points that we heard earlier. We know that the legal redress side of things is only one component of the legislation. There is a whole host of other bits in the UNCRC, and in other legislation, that are about rights protections for children and young people. Given that duty bearers are encouraged and asked to act in compliance anyway, can you unpick a little bit more the exact complexities and tensions that you have identified and whether there are things that we can consider, given the overall point that we should be complying anyway?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Maggie Chapman
Okay. I will leave it there for now, convener.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Maggie Chapman
That is really helpful.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Maggie Chapman
I know that other members want to come in, so I will leave it there.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Maggie Chapman
That is really helpful. I have a general question. Would you support the moratorium if it froze interest and charges in that way?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Maggie Chapman
Good morning. Thank you for joining us and for what you have said so far. I will continue with some questions on the relationship between you, as money advisers, and the kicking in—or not—of the mental health moratorium. Natalia Mendel spoke clearly about how even contacting money advisers can be a trigger and a potential hurdle for some people, and there have been suggestions about who will make the application for the moratorium and how we can ensure that that person, if it is the money adviser, will have the right information.
Natalia, do you see a situation in which you, as money advisers, might end up being gatekeepers, in a way? Are you potentially being given a responsibility that you do not want to have in your role? Is there another way of looking at the process for how the moratorium will be put in place, if we get the criteria for it sorted out?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Maggie Chapman
Absolutely. I was not trying to suggest questions of gate keeping. You made the point that partnership, collaboration and a multi-agency approach is important. Is there enough in the bill or the guidance around that? What would you like to see to support that?
Natalia Mendel, you mentioned that the people who come to you are already in a better place than many people who cannot or do not know about all that. What do we need to ensure is in place so that people know that you exist and that there is support for mental health—Joe McMonagle talked about care and support in the community—so that people do not fall through the cracks? How can we use the bill and this process to plug those gaps?